Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
Korean Society of Leisure, Recreation & Park
[ Article ]
Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park - Vol. 46, No. 4, pp.39-49
ISSN: 1598-0413 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Dec 2022
Received 08 Nov 2022 Revised 19 Dec 2022 Accepted 26 Dec 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26446/kjlrp.2022.12.46.4.39

국내 여성 여가활동 참가자의 여가참여 특성이 여가생활 만족에 미치는 영향: 여성가족 패널조사 7차, 8차 결과를 중심으로

이동진1 ; 유병희2
1연세대학교 교수
2덕성여자대학교 부교수
The Effects of Female Leisure Activity Participants’ Leisure Participatory Characteristics on Leisure Life Satisfaction: Focusing on the results of the 7th and 8th Korean Longitudinal Survey of Women and Families
Lee, Dong-Jin1 ; Yu, Byunghee2
1Yonsei University
2Duksung Women’s University

Correspondence to: Yu, Byunghee E-mail: byungheeyu@duksung.ac.kr

Abstract

In the midst of growing importance of leisure activities in one’s life, this study tested and validated the detailed impacts of leisure activity participatory characteristics(participation frequency, diversity, time and money spent) on female leisure participants’ leisure life satisfaction using the 7th and 8th Korean longitudinal survey data of women and families collected by Korean Women’s Development Institute (7th N=9,602, 8th N=9,175). The results showed that leisure activity participation frequency and diversity have linearly positive impacts on leisure life satisfaction while time and money spent on leisure activity turn out to have inverted-U relationships with leisure life satisfaction. This means that a moderate degree of time or money spending on leisure activity is more effective in enhancing one’s leisure life satisfaction than too much or too little spending of time and money on leisure activity. The interactive effects among participatory characteristics were further examined using Process Macro dual moderation analysis(model 2). The results showed that there is a significant interaction between leisure activity participation frequency and money spent on leisure activity. The same analysis for respondents with high resource constraint (married women with a job) showed that leisure activity participation frequency has significant interactions with both money spent and time spent on leisure activities especially. The results imply that excessive time and money spent on leisure activity can harm one’s leisure life satisfaction and therefore, it is important to optimally manage one’s leisure participation in terms of frequency, diversity, time and money spent on leisure activities to effectively enhance one’s leisure life satisfaction.

Keywords:

leisure activity participatory characteristics, leisure life satisfaction, non-linear effect, Korean longitudinal survey of women and families

키워드:

여가참여특성, 여가생활만족, 비선형효과, 여성가족패널조사

Acknowledgments

이 논문은 연세대학교 경영연구소의 연구비 지원을 받음.

References

  • 김나정, 유병희(2020). 개인 영역의 소비가 소비자 삶의 질에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구: 통합적 소비전략을 중심으로, 소비자학연구, 31(4), 1-30.
  • 김영재, & 김이삭. (2022). COVID-19 상황에서 코로나 스트레스가 일-여가 갈등과 일-여가 촉진에 미치는 영향. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 46(1), 77-89.
  • 김은정. (2020). 중년층의 이중부양 부담에 대한 소고: 개인의 생애 전이와 이를 둘러싼 인구사회학적 맥락을 중심으로. 사회사상과 문화, 23(3), 179-217.
  • 박세정(2020). 소득 계층에 따른 시간 빈곤 결정요인 분석. 보건사회연구, 40(1), 206-237.
  • 손영미, & 신규리. (2021). 코로나 19 시기, 유아 및 초등학생 자녀를 둔 워킹맘의 여가 경험에 대한 현상학적 분석. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 45(3), 259-273.
  • 이유진, 김태환, 황선환(2021). 빅데이터를 활용한 Covid-19 여가소비 분석: Pre-Corona vs. With-Corona. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 45(2), 21-36.
  • 전영호, 김지현, 김소연, 최현자(2022). 한국 중년기 가계의 다중빈곤 연구: 소득, 자산, 시간 빈곤을 중심으로. 소비자학연구, 33(2), 87-111.
  • 주재선, 이동선, 조선미, 윤형주, 송치선, 이진숙, 임연규, 손창균(2021). 2021년 여성가족패널조사. 서울: 한국여성정책연구원.
  • Auld, C. J., & Case, A. J. (1997). Social exchange processes in leisure and non-leisure settings: A review and exploratory investigation. Journal of Leisure Research, 29(2), 183-200. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1997.11949793]
  • Chen, C. C., Zou, S., & Gao, J. (2020). Towards the Recovery Mechanisms of Leisure Travel Experiences: Does the Length of Vacation Matter?. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 37(5), 636-648. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2018.1525469]
  • Chen, S. T., Hyun, J., Graefe, A. R., Mowen, A. J., Almeida, D. M., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2020). The influence of leisure engagement on daily emotional well-being. Leisure Sciences, 1-18. [https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2020.1757537]
  • DeLeire, T., & Kalil, A. (2010). Does Consumption Buy Happiness? Evidence from the United States. International Review of Economics, 57(2), 163-176. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-010-0093-6]
  • Garst, B., Scheider, I., & Baker, D. (2001). Outdoor adventure program participation impacts on adolescent self-perception. Journal of Experiential Education, 24(1), 41-49. [https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590102400109]
  • Granzin, K. L., & Haggard, L. M. (2000). An integrative explanation for quality of life: Development and test of a structural model. In Advances in Quality of Life Theory and Research (pp. 31-63). Springer, Dordrecht. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4291-5_3]
  • Havitz, M. E., & Mannell, R. C. (2005). Enduring involvement, situational involvement, and flow in leisure and non-leisure activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(2), 152-177. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2005.11950048]
  • Hayes, A.(2022). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A regression-based approach(3rd ed.) New York, The Guilford Press.
  • Kemperman, A. D., & Timmermans, H. J. (2008). Influence of socio-demographics and residential environment on leisure activity participation. Leisure sciences, 30(4), 306-324. [https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400802165099]
  • Kuykendall, L., Tay, L., & Ng, V. (2015). Leisure Engagement and Subjective Wellbeing: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(2), 364-403. [https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038508]
  • Lykken, D.(1999). For Distinguished Contributions to Psychophysiology. Psychophysiology, 36, 537-542. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3650537]
  • Newman, D. B., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2014). “Leisure and Subjective Well-being: A Model of Psychological Mechanisms as Mediating Factors,” Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(3), 555-578. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9435-x]
  • Palen, L. A., & Coatsworth, J. D. (2007). Activity-based identity experiences and their relations to problem behavior and psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 30(5), 721-737. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.11.003]
  • Patry, D. A., Blanchard, C. M., & Mask, L. (2007). Measuring university students' regulatory leisure coping styles: Planned breathers or avoidance?. Leisure Sciences, 29(3), 247-265. [https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400701257963]
  • Pierce, J. R., & Aguinis, H. (2013). The too-much-of-a-good-thing effect in management. Journal of Management, 39(2), 313-338. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410060]
  • Qian, X., Yarnal, C. M., & Almeida, D. M. (2013). Does leisure time as a stress coping resource increase affective complexity? Applying the Dynamic Model of Affect (DMA). Journal of Leisure Research, 45(3), 393-414. [https://doi.org/10.18666/jlr-2013-v45-i3-3157]
  • Ready, R. E., Marquez, D. X., & Akerstedt, A. (2009). Emotion in younger and older adults: Retrospective and prospective associations with sleep and physical activity. Experimental Aging Research, 35(3), 348-368. [https://doi.org/10.1080/03610730902922184]
  • Sala, G., Jopp, D., Gobet, F., Ogawa, M., Ishioka, Y., Masui, Y., ... & Gondo, Y. (2019). The impact of leisure activities on older adults’ cognitive function, physical function, and mental health. PloS one, 14(11), e0225006. [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225006]
  • Schulz, P., Schulte, J., Raube, S., Disouky, H., & Kandler, C. (2018). The role of leisure interest and engagement for subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(4), 1135-1150. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9863-0]
  • Seligman, M. (2011). Flourish: A New Understanding of Happiness, Wellbeing -And How to Achieve Them. Nicholas Brealey Pub.
  • Stebbins, R. A. (2007). Serious Leisure: A Perspective for Our Time. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Tinsley, H. E., Tinsley, D. J., & Croskeys, C. E. (2002). Park usage, social milieu, and psychosocial benefits of park use reported by older urban park users from four ethnic groups. Leisure Sciences, 24(2), 199-218. [https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400252900158]
  • Vallerand, R. J., Blanchard, C., Mageau, G. A., Koestner, R., Ratelle, C., Léonard, M., ... & Marsolais, J. (2003). Les Passions de L'ame: On Obsessive and Harmonious Passion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 756-767. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.756]
  • Watson, D. (2002). Positive Affectivity: The Disposition to Experience Pleasurable Emotional States. In C. R. Snyder & S. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp. 106-119). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Wei, S., & Milman, A. (2002). The Impact of Participation in Activities while on Vacation on Seniors' Psychological Wellbeing: A Path Model Application. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 26(2), 175-185. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348002026002006]