Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
Korean Society of Leisure, Recreation & Park
[ Article ]
Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park - Vol. 43, No. 3, pp.81-90
ISSN: 1598-0413 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Sep 2019
Received 08 Aug 2019 Revised 28 Aug 2019 Accepted 19 Sep 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26446/kjlrp.2019.9.43.3.81

한국인 여가반추척도 개발과 타당화 검증

김영재1
1중앙대학교
Development of the Korean Leisure-Related Rumination Scale and Verification of the Validity
Kim, Young Jae1
1Chung-Ang University

Correspondence to: Kim, Young-Jae ChungAng University, 84 Heukseok-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Korea Tel: +82-2-820-5382, Fax:+82-812-2729, E-mail: yjkim@cau.co.kr

Abstract

This study suggests a measurement tool, based on the concept of korean leisure-related rumination. For this study, the previous studies on rumination were considered and leisure-related rumination factors perceived by Korean people were integrated. Then the validity was verified through conceptual and statistical procedures. For data analysis, questionnaires collected from 995 normal people (539 males, 456 females) in Seoul, Gyeonggi Province, Gyeongnam Province and Busan were employed. In this study, leisure-related rumination factors that may appear in everyday life were considered and according to the conceptual procedure, the statistical validity and reliability were verified to provide an appropriate measurement tool. In order to obtain the validity, reliability and internal consistency of the leisure-related rumination scale, exploratory-confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach α were applied and significant results were found in individual factors of the leisure-related rumination scale. For evaluating the goodness-of-fit of the factor structure extracted from exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis was conducted. As a result, leisure-related rumination factors were classified into affective, problem-solving and negative evaluation. It is considered that based on this study result, further research will need to build up more basic data of leisure-related rumination for leisure activity majors and students by examining the correlation among attitude, boredom, restriction and motivation, which are socio-psychological variables related to rumination of this study and leisure activity of the existing studies.

Keywords:

korean leisure-related rumination, rumination, affective, problem-solving, negative evaluation

키워드:

여가, 일반추, 여가반추, 딴짓, 계획된행동이론

References

  • 김계수(2002). AMOS구조방정식 모형. 서울: 고려정보산업.
  • 김기탁(2007). 참여스포츠 소비자의 재구매 의사결정에 관한 연구: 신체적 자기개념과 소비경험의 중재효과 분석. 미간행 박사학위논문. 서울대학교 대학원.
  • 김영주(2009). 사회불안의 사후반추 질문지 개발 및 타당화 연구. 미간행 석사학위논문. 가톨릭대학교 대학원.
  • 박은혜(2018). 한국판 일 관련 반추 척도 타당화 연구. 미간행 석사학위논문. 중앙대학교대학원.
  • 오수학, 김병준(2002). 심리측정도구의 타당도에 관한 새로운 개념과 검증방법. 한국스포츠심리학회, 13(3), 111-127.
  • 이전호(2016.06.17). 직장인, 하루 1시간 10분은 업무 외 딴짓. CBS노컷뉴스. https://www.nocutnews.co.kr/news/4609457, .
  • 정윤식(2017.05.29.). "카톡 좀 하지 말아주세요"…퇴근 후 연결되지 않을 권리. SBS 뉴스. https://news.sbs.co.kr/news/endPage.do?news_id=N1004219385&plink=COPYPASTE&cooper=SBSNEWSEND, .
  • 정진영(2016.06.18.). 직장인들 “업무 중 딴짓, 일의 능률 높여준다. 헤럴드경제. http://heraldk.com/2016/06/18, /.
  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control(pp. 11-39). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2]
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T]
  • Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. L. (1992). Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice. Journal of leisure research, 24(3), 207-224. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1992.11969889]
  • Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?. Psychological bulletin, 134(6), 779. [https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012815]
  • Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., Tedeschi, R. G., Triplett, K. N., Vishnevsky, T., & Lindstrom, C. M. (2011). Assessing posttraumatic cognitive processes: The event related rumination inventory. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 24(2), 137-156. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2010.529901]
  • Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276. [https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10]
  • Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000). The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychological review, 107(2), 261. [https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.107.2.261]
  • Cropley, M., & Millward Purvis, L. (2003). Job strain and rumination about work issues during leisure time: A diary study. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 12(3), 195-207. [https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320344000093]
  • Cropley, M., & Zijlstra, F. R. (2011). Work and rumination. Handbook of stress in the occupations, 487-503. [https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857931153.00061]
  • Cropley, M., Michalianou, G., Pravettoni, G., & Millward, L. J. (2012). The relation of post-work ruminative thinking with eating behaviour. Stress and Health, 28(1), 23-30. [https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1397]
  • Etzion, D., Eden, D., & Lapidot, Y. (1998). Relief from job stressor and burnout: Reserve service as a respite. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(4), 577. [https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.83.4.577]
  • Fritz, C., Yankelevich, M., Zarubin, A., & Barger, P. (2010). Happy, healthy, and productive: the role of detachment from work during nonwork time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 977. [https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019462]
  • Hartman, L. M. (1984). Cognitive components of social anxiety. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40(1), 137-139. [https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198401)40:1<137::AID-JCLP2270400126>3.0.CO;2-Y]
  • Lauren, M, 구승준. (2015). [뇌과학 탐험]유레카! 뇌과학으로 본 통찰. BRAIN, 51, 58-61.
  • Martin, L. L., & Tesser, A. (1996). Some ruminative thoughts. Advances in social cognition, 9, 1-47.
  • McLaughlin, K. A., Borkovec, T.D., & Sibrava, N. J. (2007). The effect of worry and rumination on affect and cognitive activity. Behavior Therapy, 38(1), 23-38. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2006.03.003]
  • Segerstrom, S. C., Stanton, A. L., Alden, L. E., & Shortridge, B. E. (2003). A multidimensional structure for repetitive thought: What’s on your mind, and how, and how much?. Journal of personality and social psychology, 85(5), 909. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.909]
  • Sonnentag, S., & Bayer, U. V. (2005). Switching off mentally: predictors and consequences of psychological detachment from work during off-job time. Journal of occupational health psychology, 10(4), 393. [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.10.4.393]
  • Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2007). The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of occupational health psychology, 12(3), 204. [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204]
  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: L. L. Erlbaum Associates.
  • Wright, M., Bee, J. S. (1980). User manual for the conventional item analysis program version 3.20, MicroCAT and ITEMAN assessment system Corporation Inc.