여가 동기 유형에 따른 레크리에이션 전문화, 전문화 수준 향상 노력 및 전문화 의도의 차이

정명숙¹ ; 황선환²

1서울시립대학교 박사과정
2서울시립대학교 교수

Differences in Recreation Specialization, Efforts to Increase the level of Recreation Specialization, and Intent of Recreation Specialization Increase among type of Leisure Motivation

Chung, Myungsook¹ ; Hwang, Sunhwan²

1University of Seoul
2University of Seoul

Correspondence to: Hwang, Sunhwan E-mail: shhwang@uos.ac.kr

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the differences in recreation specialization, efforts to increase the level of recreation specialization, and intent of recreation specialization increase among type of leisure motivation. To achieve the research objectives, frequency analysis, descriptive statistics, confirmatory factor analysis, reliability analysis, k-means cluster analysis, & one-way analysis of variance, were conducted using SPSS 27.0 and AMOS 26.0 programs, and the following research results were obtained. First, four clusters were formed according to the type of leisure motivation, which were categorized as intrinsic type, escaping type, extrinsic type, and seeking type, respectively. Second, there was a statistically significant difference in recreation specialization among leisure motivation type(p<.01), with recreation specialization in the intrinsic type, escaping type, and seeking type groups being higher than in the extrinsic type. Third, although there was a statistically significant difference in efforts to increase the level of recreation specialization among leisure motivation type(p<.05), post-hoc analyses did not reveal significant differences among the four groups. Finally, there was a statistically significant difference in intent of recreation specialization increase among leisure motivation type(p<.001), with intent of recreation specialization increase in the extrinsic type and seeking type having higher than intrinsic type and escaping type.

This study suggests that university students should be encouraged to participate in leisure activities as a way to increase their satisfaction with school life, and that various on-campus student welfare policies can be proposed to encourage participation in leisure activities.

Keywords:

leisure motivation, recreation specialization, efforts to increase the level of recreation specialization, intent of recreation specialization increase

키워드:

여가 동기, 레크리에이션 전문화, 전문화 수준 향상 노력, 전문화 의도

References

김미량(2015). 진지한 여가 척도의 재정립. 한국체육학회지, 54(2), 313-322.
김미량(2019). 상태로써의 진지한 여가 수준 탐색. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 43(2), 67-78.
김미량, 황선환(2011). 진지한 여가와 레크리에이션 전문화 및 몰입의 구조모형분석. 여가문화학회지, 9(1), 27-41.
김선희(2010). 대학생의 여가기능과 의사소통능력, 자기표현행동과의 관계. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 22(1), 11-22.
노경섭(2019). 제대로 알고 쓰는 논문 통계분석: SPSS & AMOS (개정증보판). 한빛아카데미 (주).
양혜주, 황선환(2022). 추구 회피동기와 모바일 기반의 스포츠 콘텐츠 이용행동의 관계. 여가학연구 20(1): 33-46.
유진(1993). 스포츠 동기이론의 통합적 모델. 한국교육문제연구, (8), 233-258.
이문진(2011). 레크리에이션 전문화 척도 개발. 국내박사학위논문 서울대학교 대학원, 서울
이보람, 정지혜(2015). 자기결정성이론에 근거한 한국형 스포츠동기척도 (SMS-K) 개발. 한국스포츠심리학회지, 26(3), 29-40.
정하나(2022). 추구-회피동기 수준에 따른 여가만족, 레크리에이션 전문화, 행복의 관계: 야구동호인을 대상으로. 국내박사학위논문 서울시립대학교 일반대학원, 서울
최성범, 함경수(2009). 대학생의 여가참여유형과 자기오락화 능력 및 대학생활만족의 관계. 한국체육과학회지, 18(3), 417-429.
통계개발원(2022). 2022 한국의 사회동향(Korean Social Trends 2022). 통계개발원 연구보고서. http://sri.kostat.go.kr
한국교육개발원(2012). 통계로 본 한국과 세계교육, 학생의 삶 자료집.
황선환(2010). 대학생의 여가 동기 유형에 따른 레크리에이션 전문화 과정의 구조모형 분석. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 34(2), 47-57.
Alexandris, K., Tsorbatzoudis, C., & Grouios, G. (2002). Perceived constraints on recreational sport participation: Investigating their relationship with intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation and amotivation. Journal of leisure research, 34(3), 233-252. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2002.11949970]
Beard, J. G., & Ragheb, M. G. (1983). Measuring leisure motivation. Journal of leisure research, 15(3), 219-228. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1983.11969557]
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588. [https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.588]
Bryan, H. (1977). Leisure value systems and recreational specialization: The case of trout fishermen. Journal of leisure research, 9(3), 174-187. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1977.11970328]
Bryan, H. (1979). Conflict in the great outdoors. University of Alabama, Bureau of Public Administration. Sociological Studies, 4, 380-389.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Conceptualizations of intrinsic motivation and self-determination. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior, 11-40. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7_2]
Harackiewicz, J. M. (1979), "The effects of reqard contingency and performance feedback on intrinsic motivation," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8): 1352-1361. [https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.37.8.1352]
Hills, P., Argyle, M., & Reeves, R. (2000). Individual differences in leisure satisfactions: An investigation of four theories of leisure motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(4), 763-779. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00137-3]
Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1982). Toward a social psychological theory of tourism motivation: A rejoinder. Annals of tourism research, 9(2), 256-262. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(82)90049-4]
Kuentzel, W. F., & McDonald, C. D. (1992). Differential effects of past experience, commitment, and lifestyle dimensions on river use specialization. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(3), 269-287. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1992.11969893]
Losier, G. F., Bourque, P. E., & Vallerand, R. J. (1993). A motivational model of leisure participation in the elderly. The Journal of psychology, 127(2), 153-170. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1993.9915551]
Mannell, R. C., & Bradley, W. (1986). Does greater freedom always lead to greater leisure? Testing a person x environment model of freedom and leisure. Journal of leisure research, 18(4), 215-230. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1986.11969661]
Mannell, R. C., & Kleiber, D. A. (1997). A social psychology of leisure. Venture Publishing Inc..
Maslow, A. H. (1954). The instinctoid nature of basic needs. Journal of personality. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1954.tb01136.x]
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality: A clinical and experimental study of fifty men of college age. Oxford, England: Oxford Univ. Press.
Neulinger, J. (1981). The psychology of leisure: (2nd ed.). Springfield, IL; Charles C. Thomas.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). An overview of psychological measurement. Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders: A handbook, 97-146. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2490-4_4]
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67. [https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020]
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68. [https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68]
Scott. D. (2012). Serious leisure and Recreation Specialization: An Uneasy Marriage. Leisure Science, 34, 366-371. [https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2012.687645]
Scott, D., & Shafer, C. S. (2001). Recreational specialization: A critical look at the construct. Journal of leisure research, 33(3), 319-343. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2001.11949944]
Šimková, E., & Holzner, J. (2014). Motivation of tourism participants. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 660-664. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.455]
SK텔레콤 뉴스룸 운영팀(2020. 07. 16). 코로나19 시대, 대학생들의 생각이 궁금하다, 1탄. SK텔레콤 뉴스룸.
Stebbins, R. A. (1982). Serious leisure: A conceptual statement. Pacific sociological review, 25(2), 251-272. [https://doi.org/10.2307/1388726]
Stebbins, R. A. (1992). Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure. McGill-Queen's Press-MQUP. [https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773563346]
Williams, D. R. (1985). A developmental model of recreation choice behavior. In G. Stankey, & S. McCool (Comps.), Proceedings: symposium on recreation choice behavior (pp. 31-37).