Korean Society of Leisure, Recreation & Park

Current Issue

Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park - Vol. 48 , No. 3

[ Article ]
Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park - Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 91-111
Abbreviation: KSLRP
ISSN: 1598-0413 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Jun 2024
Received 07 May 2024 Revised 08 Jun 2024 Accepted 17 Jun 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26446/kjlrp.2024.6.48.2.91

고령자의 스마트 기기 활용 여가활동 여부와 삶의 질 관계 검증 : 자기효능감과 회복탄력성의 이중매개효과
이현주1 ; 김남화1 ; 김의현1 ; 한여민1 ; 신혜리1 ; 김영선1
1경희대학교 노인학과 고령서비스-테크 융합전공

A Study to Verify the Relationship between Leisure Activities using Smart Devices and Quality of Life in Older Adults : The Dual Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy and Resilience.
Lee, Hyun-Joo1 ; Kim, Nam-Hwa1 ; Kim, Eui-Hyun1 ; Han, Yeo-Min1 ; Shin, Hye-Ri1 ; Kim, Young-Sun1
1Dept. of Gerontology(AgeTech-Service Convergence Major), Kyung Hee University
Correspondence to : Kim, Young-Sun E-mail: ysunkim@khu.ac.kr

Funding Information ▼

Abstract

This study examined the dual mediating effect of self-efficacy and resilience in the relationship between leisure activities using smart devices and quality of life in the older adults. For this study, 515 older adults aged 55 or older were selected as final analysis subjects using the ‘Health Aging Healing Care’ data collected by Digital New Aging Research Institute of Kyung Hee University in 2021. As an analysis method, SPSS PROCESS macro program was utilized to confirm the dual mediating effect by verifying a serial multiple mediation model with two parameters, and the significance of the mediating effect was confirmed using bootstrapping. The key results of this study are as follows: First, the elderly's leisure activities using smart devices were found to have a significant impact on self-efficacy, self-efficacy on resilience, and resilience on quality of life. The direct effect of leisure activities using smart devices among the elderly on quality of life was not significant. Second, in the relationship between leisure activities using smart devices and quality of life among the older adults, the path leading to quality of life through self-efficacy and resilience sequentially was found to be significant, confirming the dual mediating effect. Based on these results, we derived effective intervention directions to improve the quality of life of the older adults and prepared theoretical basic data for research on leisure activities using smart devices for the older adults.


Keywords: leisure activities using smart devices, quality of life, self-efficacy, resilience, older adults, dual mediating effect
키워드: 스마트 기기 활용 여가활동, 삶의 질, 자기효능감, 회복탄력성, 고령자, 이중매개효과

Acknowledgments

이 논문은 2021년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2021S1A3A2A01096346).


References
1. 과학기술정통부(2024). 2024 정책돋보기
2. 권순재. (2018). 여가활동으로서 SNS 이용동기가 여가만족과 여가지속의도에 미치는 영향. 한국여가레크레이션학회지, 42(4), 83-94.
3. 고용상 연령차별금지 및 중·고령자고용촉진에 관한 법률 시행형 제 2조, 2022
4. 김명용, & 전혜정. (2017). 노인의 스마트폰 이용이 삶의 만족도에 미치는 영향: 사회활동참여의 매개효과. 노인복지연구, 72(3), 343-370.
5. 김범중, & 이미진. (2020). 노인 삶의 질 영향요인분석: 인구사회학적 특성과 소득원을 중심으로. 한국지역사회복지학, 75, 1-27.
6. 김상혁, 권상미, & 김용일. (2011). 오락을 목적으로 한 대학생들의 온라인 여가활동 유형별 인터넷 자기효능감, 즐거움 및 고독감 차이에 관한 연구. 관광레저연구, 23(1), 375-394.
7. 김은수, 한혜지, 황선환, & 김태환. (2021). 진지한 여가가 주관적 삶의 질에 미치는 영향, 여가학 연구, 19(2), 67-84.
8. 김자영. (2017). 취업여부와 교육수준이 노인의 삶의 만족도에 미치는 영향: 자아존중감의 매개효과 검증: 자아존중감의 매개효과검증. 노인복지연구, 72(3), 167-190.
9. 김재현, & 박진상. (2021). 스마트 러닝 기반의 세대통합 프로그램이 회복탄력성, 자아존중감, 긍정정서에 미치는 효과. 한국산학기술학회 논문지, 22(12), 459-469.
10. 김진원, & 임구원. (2020). 노인의 다양한 여가활동이 삶의 질에 미치는 영향에 관한 종단 분석. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 44(4), 11-24.
11. 김춘옥. (2015). 노인의 여가몰입이 삶의 질에 미치는 영향. 한국복지실천학회지, 6(2), 78-99.
12. 김충련. (2012). SPSS 데이터 분석: SPSS statistics 20. 파주: 21세기사.
13. 김혜선. (2021). 노인의 우울이 건강관련 삶의 질에 미치는 영향: 신체활동의 조절효과. 한국웰니스학회지, 16(2), 173-179.
14. 김효선, 김혜령, & 한광희. (2010). 노인들의 디지털 기기에 대한 인식. 한국 HCI 학회 학술대회, 739-742.
15. 노준석, & 손용. (2004). 전자미디어의 몰입경험과 여가만족의 상고간성 분석: TV와 intement 비교를 중심으로. 한국방송학보, 18(1), 116-173.
16. 문성미. (2017). 노인의 사회경제적 상태, 건강상태, 건강행태와 건강관련 삶의 질의 관계: 성별 차이를 중심으로. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(6), 259-271.
17. 문준호, 송명근, 이원석, & 당약함. (2021). 고령화 패널 자료를 이용한 노인 삶의 질의 결정요인. 공공정책연구, 38(1), 233-254.
18. 문화체육관광부(2018). 2018 국민여가활동조사
19. 문화체육관광부(2020). 2020 국민여가활동조사
20. 문화체육관광부(2022). 2022 국민여가활동조사
21. 문화체육관광부(2023). 2023 국민여가활동조사
22. 박선숙. (2018). 노인의 삶의 만족도 결정요인에 관한 연구: 의사결정트리모형을 이용하여. 사회과학연구, 29(3), 39-57.
23. 박인숙, & 문영실. (2020). 농촌 지역 노인의 SNS 활용 소통 프로그램 개발 및 효과성 연구: 자기효능감과 고독감을 중심으로. 한국농촌간호학회지, 15(1), 8-14.
24. 방미선, & 이지현. (2017). 노인 위암 환자의 회복탄력성 영향요인. Asian Oncology Nursing, 17(3), 170-179.
25. 보건복지부(2020). 2020년도 노인실태조사
26. 배성만, & 고영삼. (2017). 장? 노년층의 스마트폰과의존 영향요인에 대한 탐색적 연구. 디지털융복합연구, 15(7), 111-121.
27. 서상민. (2019). 스마트폰 활용 교육이 노인들의 자기 효능감, 행복감, 삶의 질에 미치는 효과. 융합정보논문지, 9(5), 165-171.
28. 서울특별시(2024). 2024 달라지는 서울생활
29. 송영은. (2022). 코로나 19 시대 노인의 신체활동량이 삶의 질에 미치는 영향. 한국웰니스학회지, 17(4), 275-280.
30. 송지준, & 엄인숙. (2008). 중년과 노인의 여가활동유형과 우울, 고독감간의 관계. 관광연구, 23(1), 43-62.
31. 이상경, 남윤희, & 고동우. (2016). 디지털 기기를 활용한 여가 활동의 심리적 편익. 관광학연구, 40(6), 145-162.
32. 이승희, 한미진, 이점숙, & 김선호. (2023). 노인의 정보화기기 활용능력이 삶의 만족도에 미치는 영향: 사회참여활동과 우울의 연속다중매개효과. 한국산학기술학회 논문지, 24(6), 406-416.
33. 이종화, 최수찬, 윤성민, & 이현. (2022). 고령자의 나눔행동 참여가 삶의 만족과 우울에 미치는 효과성 검증. 노인복지연구, 77(1), 285-310.
34. 이지선. (2021). 한국 후기 여성노인의 건강관련 삶의 질 관련요인: 거주지역의 영향. Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing, 23(3).
35. 이향숙, & 신원우. (2016). 노인의 여가활동 유형이 생활만족도에 미치는 영향. 문화산업연구, 16(3), 157-165.
36. 정순둘, & 성민현. (2012). 연령집단별 사회적 자본과 삶의 만족도 관계비교. 보건사회연구, 32(4), 249-272.
37. 정윤하, & 전태준. (2011). 디지털시대의 노인정보화와 여가활동. 한국여가레크레이션학회학술세미나자료집, 64-76.
38. 지은정. (2022). 청년과 고령자의 일자리 세대담론에 대한 연구: 일자리의 질을 중심으로. 한국사회정책, 29(2), 149-186.
39. 최명진, & 김기연. (2022). 한국판 노인 삶의 질척도 (K-CASP-16) 의 타당화 연구. 한국보건사회연구, 42(2), 85-101.
40. 최순화. (2022). 시니어의 인터넷 서비스 이용에 관한 구조적 영향 관계 분석: 온라인쇼핑, 금융거래를 중심으로. 사회적경제와 정책연구, 12(2), 241-262.
41. 최형임, & 송인욱. (2020). 노인의 디지털 정보활용능력과 삶의 만족도의 관계에서 자기효능감의 매개효과 분석. 한국산학기술학회논문지, 21(6), 246-255.
42. 최효진, & 이홍직. (2019). 노인의 삶의 질에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구: 인구사회학적 요인, 환경적 요인, 제도적 요인을 중심으로. 한국웰니스학회지, 14(1), 103-112.
43. 컨슈머인사이트(2021). 여가문화체육주례조사 2021
44. 태명원. (2021). 노인의 자기효능감이 삶의 질에 미치는 영향-자아존중감의 매개효과를 중심으로. 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 21(4), 220-232.
45. 허원무. (2013). 매개효과 분석 방법의 최근 트렌드: 부트스트래핑을 이용한 단순, 다중, 이중매개효과 분석 방법. 기업과혁신연구, 6(3), 43-59.
46. Aggarwal, B., Xiong, Q., & Schroeder-Butterfill, E. (2020). Impact of the use of the internet on quality of life in older adults: Review of literature. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 21, e55.
47. Allaire, J. C., McLaughlin, A. C., Trujillo, A., Whitlock, L. A., LaPorte, L., & Gandy, M. (2013). Successful aging through digital games: Socioemotional differences between older adult gamers and non-gamers. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1302-1306.
48. Brinkhof, L. P., Huth, K. B., Murre, J. M., de Wit, S., Krugers, H. J., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2021). The interplay between quality of life and resilience factors in later life: a network analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-20.
49. Campbell, A., & Yang, J. (2011). Leisure innovation among post-retirement women in north-eastern China. Annals of Leisure Research, 14(4), 325-340.
50. Carriedo, A., Cecchini, J. A., Fernandez-Rio, J., & Méndez-Giménez, A. (2020). COVID-19, Psychological well-being and physical activity levels in older adults during the nationwide lockdown in Spain. The American journal of geriatric psychiatry: official journal of the American Assosication for Geriatric Psychiatry, 28(11), 1146-1155.
51. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational research methods, 4(1), 62-83.
52. Choi, H. I., & Song, I. (2020). The mediating effect of self-efficacy between the elderly's digital information literacy and life satisfaction. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 21(6), 246-255.
53. Dormann, C. F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C., Carl, G., Carre, G., ... & Lautenbach, S. (2013). Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography, 36(1), 27-46.
54. Fokkema, T., & Knipscheer, K. (2007). Escape loneliness by going digital: a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of a Dutch experiment in using ECT to overcome loneliness among older adults. Aging & mental health, 11(5), 496-504.
55. Guccione, A. A. (2014). Resilience and self-efficacy as mediators of quality of life in geriatric rehabilitation. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 30(3), 164-169.
56. Gallistl, V., & Nimrod, G. (2020). Media-based leisure and wellbeing: A study of older internet users. Leisure Studies, 39(2), 251-265.
57. Hayes, A. F. (2015). PROCESS macro를 이용한 매개분석⋅조절분석 및 조절된 매개분석 (이형권, 역). 서울: 신영사. (원서출판 2013).
58. Hyde, M., Wiggins, R. D., Higgs, P., & Blane, D. B. (2003). A measure of quality of life in early old age: The theory, development and properties of a needs satisfaction model (CASP-19). Aging & mental health, 7(3), 186-194.
59. Ivan, L., & Hebblethwaite, S. (2016). Grannies on the net: Grandmotheres’ experiences of Facebook in family communication. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 18(1), 11-25.
60. Jalenques, I., Rondepierre, F., Rachez, C., Lauron, S., & Guiguet-Auclair, C. (2020). Health-related quality of life among community-dwelling people aged 80 years and over: a cross-sectional study in France. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18, 1-24.
61. Kamalpour, M., Watson, J., & Buys, L.(2020). How can online communities support resilience factors among older adults. International Journal of Human– Computer Interaction, 36(14), 1342-1353
62. Kang, J. P., & Yoon, J. (2017). A study on multi-level models in life satisfaction of elderly living alone: Moderating effect of elderly's leisure activity and social support. Journal of Digital Convergence,15(5), 89-98.
63. Kaplan, M. (1960). Leisure in America: A social inquiry. New York, NY: Wiley.
64. Kim, Y., Kim, B., Hwang, H. S., & Lee, D. (2020). Social media and life satisfaction among college students: A moderated mediation model of SNS communication networrk heterogeneity and social self-efficacy on satisfaction with campus life. The Social Science Journal, 57(1), 85-100.
65. Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling(2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
66. Koivunen, K., Portegijs, E., Sillanpää, E., Eronen, J., Kokko, K., & Rantanen, T. (2022). Maintenance of high quality of life as an indicator of resilience during COVID-19 social distancing among community-dwelling older adults in Finland. Quality of Life Research, 1-10.
67. Lee, K. H., Xu, H., & Wu, B. (2020). Gender differences in quality of life among community-dwelling older adults in low-and middle-income countries: Results from the study on global ageing and adult health (SAGE). BMC public health, 20, 1-10.
68. Li, C., Shi, X., & Dang, J. (2014). Online communication and subjective well-being in Chinese college students: The mediating role of shyness and social self-efficacy. Computers in Human behavior, 34, 89-95.
69. Lin, M. (2024). Leisure innovation for older adults in Urban China: Application and reexamination of leisure innovation theory. Leisure Sciences, 46(1), 82-100.
70. López-Sintas, J., Rojas-DeFrancisco, L., & García-Álvarez, E. (2017). Home-based digital leisure: Doing the same leisure activities, but digital, Cogent Social Sciences, 3(1), 1-14.
71. Musich, S., Wang, S. S., Schaeffer, J. A., Kraemer, S., Wicker, E., & Yeh, C. S. (2022). The association of increasing resilience with positive health outcomes among older adults. Geriatric Nursing, 44, 97-104.
72. Nguyen, L. H., Tran, B. X., Hoang Le, Q. N., Tran, T. T., & Latkin, C. A. (2017). Quality of life profile of general Vietnamese population using EQ-5D-5L. Health and quality of life outcomes, 15, 1-13.
73. Nimrod, G., & Kleiber, D. A. (2007). Reconsidering change and continuity in later life: Toward an innovation theory of successful aging. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 65(1), 1-22.
74. Nimrod, G. (2008). In support of innovation theory: Innovation in activity patterns and life satisfaction among recently retired individuals. Ageing & Society, 28(6), 831-846.
75. Nimrod, G., & Adoni, H. (2012). Conceptualizing e-leisure. Loisiret Société/Society and Leisure, 35(1), 31-56.
76. Nimrod, G., & Shrira, A. (2016). The paradox of leisure in later life. The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 71(1), 106-111.
77. Nimrod G. (2020). Changes internet use when coping with stress: Older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 28(10), 1020-1024.
78. Oh, S. S., Kim, K. A., Kim, M., Oh, J., Chu, S. H., & Choi, J. (2021). Measurement of digital literacy among older adults: Systematic review. Journal of medical Internet research, 23(2), 1-15.
79. Oladi, E., Esfahani, M., Azimkhani, A., Asan, S. (2023). The effect of physical activity and selected games in leisure time on the feeling of loneliness, self-efficacy, and life expectancy of elderly women. Akdeniz SporBilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 670-681.
80. Parker, S. R., & Parker, S. (1971). The future of work and leisure (Vol. 5.) New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.
81. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879-891.
82. Rahman, M. S., Ko, M., Waren, J., & Carpenter, D. (2016). Healthcare technology self-efficacy (HTSE) and its influence on individual attitude: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 12-24.
83. Regalado, F., Ortet, C. P., Costa, L. V., Santos, C., & Veloso, A. I. (2023). Assessing older adults’ perspectives on digital game-related strategies to foster active and healthy ageing. Media and Communication, 11(3), 88-100.
84. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs, 35(37), 82-003.
85. Schwarzer, R., Mueller, J., & Greenglass, E. (1999). Assessment of perceived general self-efficacy on the internet: Data collection in cyberspace. Anxiety, stress and coping, 12(2), 145-161.
86. Sharma, N. R. (2013). Resilience and self-efficacy as correlates of well-being among the elderly persons. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 39(2), 281-288.
87. Sherer, M., Maddux, J. E., Mercandante, B., Prentice-Dunn, S., Jacobs, B., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). The self-efficacy scale: Construction and validation. Psychological reports, 51(2), 663-671.
88. Sok, S. H., & Kim, K. B. (2008). A comparative study of the factors influencing quality of life between urban and rural elderly. Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 17(3), 311-321.
89. Stebbins, R. A. (1992). Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure. McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP.
90. Timberlake, J. (2011). The role of self-efficacy in the quality of life of older adults.
91. Tonga, J. B., Eilertsen, D. E., Solem, I. K. L., Arnevik, E. A., Korsnes, M. S., & Ulstein, I. D. (2020). Effect of self-efficacy on quality of life in people with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia: the mediating roles of depression and anxiety. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease & Other Dementias®, 35, 1-10.
92. Van der Meer, M. J. (2008). The sociospatial diversity in the leisure activities of older people in the Netherlands. Journal of Aging Studies, 22(1), 1-12.
93. Vassányi, I., Szakonyi, B., Loi, D., Mantur-Vierendeel, A., Quintas, J., Solinas, A., ... & Rárosi, F. (2024). Impact of information technology supported serious leisure gardening on the wellbeing of older adults: The Turntable project. Geriatric Nursing, 55, 339-345.
94. Wallinheimo, A. S., & Evans, S. L. (2022). Patterns of internet use, and associations with loneliness, amongst middle-aged and older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. In Healthcare, 10(7), 1-11.
95. Yachin, M., & Nimrod, G. (2021). Innovation in later life: A study of grandmothers and Facebook. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 92(4), 521-540.
96. Zhang,K., Burr, J. A., Mutchler, J. E., & Lu, J. (2023). Online engagement, resilience, and loneliness among older people during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Science & Medicine, 329, 1-8.
97. Zheng, W., Huang, Y., & Fu, Y. (2020). Mediating effects of psychological resilience on life satisfaction among older adults: A cross‐sectional study in China. Health & Social Care in the Community, 28(4), 1323-1332.
98. Kleiber, D., & Damali, B. A. (2016). Leisure in the third Age: Finding new value in a changing world.