대학생의 피지컬 리터러시 함양을 위한 교양체육 교육 내용 분석과 방향탐색

박인경¹

1서울과학기술대학교

Exploring the Content and Direction of General Physical Education for Enhancing Physical Literacy in University Students

Park, Inkyoung¹

1Seoul National University of Science and Technology

Correspondence to: Park, Inkyoung E-mail: pik77812@seoultech.ac.kr

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the current status of general physical education courses at universities and identify key factors necessary for these courses, with the ultimate goal of enhancing physical literacy among university students. First, the contents and structure of health and exercise-related general physical education courses were examined across 94 universities in Korea. Second, a Delphi analysis was conducted with a panel of 15 experts to define the concept and components of physical literacy specifically for university students. Third, based on these findings, open-ended surveys were administered to 15 theoretical and practical instruction experts and 15 university students to gather opinions on strategies for fostering physical literacy within university physical education curricula.

The results revealed that current university physical education courses are predominantly practice-oriented (80.7%), with a high frequency of specific sports such as golf, tennis, and badminton. Furthermore, the definition and educational objectives of physical literacy for university students differed somewhat from previously established concepts. Finally, the study identified the need for educational strategies that incorporate foundational and integrated courses, psychological health-based approaches, and activation of social and environmental connections within the general physical education curriculum. Based on these findings, the study discusses the necessity of developing health and exercise-related general physical education programs that support lifelong physical activity for university students.

Keywords:

University students, Physical literacy, Content analysis, Delphi method, Open-ended survey, Health and exercise-related general physical education

키워드:

대학생, 피지컬 리터러시, 내용 분석, 델파이분석, 개방형 설문, 건강 및 운동관련 교양체육교과

Acknowledgments

이 논문은 2022년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2022S1A5B5A16053293)

References

교육부(2015). 2015 체육과 교육과정. 교육부.
교육부(2022). 2022 체육과 교육과정. 교육부.
김성현, 김기홍, & 이지은(2021). 대학생의 체육 수업 몰입 경험과 운동 지속의도 간의 관계: 심리적 기본욕구 만족의 매개효과. 한국체육학회지, 60(2), 205–218. [https://doi.org/10.23949/kjpe.2021.03.60.2.15]
박인경, 김영호(2019). 대학생의 운동지식과 건강위험지각이 신체활동에 미치는 영향. 한국스포츠학회, 17(2), 163-177.
신기철(2021). 피지컬 리터러시(physical literacy)의 개념 정립 과정에 대한 고찰. 미래융합교육, 1(1), 1-15.
신기철(2024). 2022 개정 교육과 교육과정에 따른 초등 체육교육의 패러다임 전환: 기본 움직임 기술(FMS) 기반 초등체육에 관한 이해와 쟁점. 한국초등체육학회지, 30(3), 65-83.
안현상 외(2006). 여가생활과 스포츠. 서울: 건국대학교출판부. p26-28.
윤상용(2024). 대학생이 지각하는 교양체육수업에 대한 기대가치지각, 수업흥미, 수업만족 및 과제지속행동, 운동지속의 구조적 관계. 골프연구, 18(Special), 27-38.
이경주(2021). 대학 교양 체육수업에서 학생들의 그릿 (Grit) 이 목표몰입과 수업참여에 미치는 영향. 한국체육과학회지, 30(1), 627-642
이영국(2023). 언어학과 현상학의 관점에서 본 ‘피지컬 리터러시’ 어휘 구조의 배경과 의미 탐색. 한국초등체육학회지, 29(3), 93-108.
이호성, 박철홍(2024). 교양체육 수강 대학생의 생활스트레스가 학업성취에 미치는 영향. 한국체육무용과학회, 4(3), 77-88.
조혜원, 김형남(2024). 워드클라우드를 활용한 국내 무용교육프로그램 분석 연구. 한국무용학회지, 24(1), 101-109.
최의창(2018). 스포츠 리터러시. 서울: 레인보우북스, p112-131.
한소원(2020). 변화하는 뇌. 서울: 바다출판사, p195-208.
Allen, K. A., Vella-Brodrick, D. A., & Waters, L. (2017). Thriving students: A research-based framework for positive education. International Journal of Wellbeing, 7(3), 1–13. [https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v7i3.534]
Barnett, L. M., Dudley, D. A., Telford, R. D., & Lubans, D. R. (2019). Guidelines for the selection of physical literacy measures in physical education in Australia. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 38(2), 119–125. [https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2018-0222]
Cairney, J., Dudley, D., Kwan, M. Y. W., Bulten, R., & Kriellaars, D. (2019). Physical literacy, physical activity, and health: Toward an evidence-informed conceptual model. Sports Medicine, 49(3), 371–383. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-018-0867-3]
Chen, A. (2018). Operationalizing physical literacy for learners: Embodying the motivation to move. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 7(2), 133–135. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2018.03.002]
Chen, W., Mason, S. A., Hypnar, A. J., Zalmout, S., & Hammond-Bennett, A. (2014). Health-related physical fitness and physical activity in elementary school students. BMC Public Health, 14, 1110. [https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1110]
Dudley, D. A. (2015). A conceptual model of observed physical literacy. The Physical Educator, 72(5), 236–260. [https://doi.org/10.18666/TPE-2015-V72-I5-6134]
Ennis, C. D. (2015). Knowledge, transfer, and innovation in physical literacy curricula. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4(2), 119–124. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2015.03.001]
Huang, Y.-C., & Malina, R. M. (2010). Physical activity and health-related physical fitness in Taiwanese adolescents. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 29(2), 59–64. [https://doi.org/10.2114/jpa2.29.59]
Kirk, D. (2010). Physical education futures. Routledge. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874622]
Lundvall, S. (2015). Physical literacy in the field of physical education – A challenge and a possibility. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4(2), 113–118. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2015.02.001]
Miles, L. K., Nind, L. K., & Macrae, C. N. (2010). Moving through time. Psychological Science, 21(2), 222–223. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797609359333]
Robinson, D. B., Randall, L., & Barrett, J. (2018). Physical literacy (mis) understandings: What do leading physical education teachers know about physical literacy? Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(3), 288–298. [https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2017-0103]
Society of Health and Physical Educators. (2014). National standards & grade-level outcomes for K–12 physical education. Human Kinetics. https://www.shapeamerica.org/standards/pe/upload/National-Standards-Flyer.pdf, National Physical Education Standards
Whitehead, M. E. (2010). Physical literacy throughout the lifecourse. London Routledge.