Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
Korean Society of Leisure, Recreation & Park
[ Article ]
Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park - Vol. 49, No. 1, pp.55-64
ISSN: 1598-0413 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Sep 2024
Received 31 Jan 2025 Revised 07 Mar 2025 Accepted 17 Mar 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26446/kjlrp.2025.3.49.1.55

한·중 장애인의 상대적 여가박탈감과 삶의 만족도에 관한 비교연구

왕배녕 ; 최소담 ; 황향희1
강원대학교 박사수료
강원대학교 석사과정
1강원대학교 교수
An Comparative study on Relative Leisure Deprivation and Life Satisfaction of Persons with Disabilities in Korea and China
Wang, Pei-Ning ; Choi, So-Dam ; Hwang, Hyang-Hee1
Department of Smart Health Science and Technology, Kangwon National University
Department of Smart Health Science and Technology, Kangwon National University
1Department of Sport Science, Kangwon National University

Correspondence to: Hwang, Hyang-Hee E-mail: phyhee@kangwon.ac.kr

Abstract

This study applied Social Comparison Theory(SCT) to compare and analyze the relative leisure deprivation and life satisfaction of persons with disabilities in South Korea and China. The findings indicate that Korean persons with disabilities experience higher levels of resource-based leisure deprivation, whereas their Chinese counterparts exhibit higher levels of cognitive and emotional leisure deprivation. This suggests that relative leisure deprivation is shaped not only by the absolute availability of leisure resources but also by the process of social comparison.

Differences between the two countries were also observed in the relationship between relative leisure deprivation and life satisfaction. For Korean persons with disabilities, cognitive leisure deprivation was associated with lower life satisfaction, whereas Chinese persons exhibited higher life satisfaction despite experiencing egoistical leisure deprivation. These results empirically confirm the influence of social comparison on leisure perception and satisfaction among persons with disabilities, underscoring the need for leisure policies that extend beyond physical support to include psychological well-being. Future research should examine the relationship between relative leisure deprivation and life satisfaction across diverse cultural contexts and explore its impact on behavioral changes, such as participation in leisure activities and the development of social relationships.

Keywords:

Persons with disabilities in Korea and China, social comparison theory, relative leisure deprivation, life satisfaction

키워드:

한·중 장애인, 사회 비교 이론, 상대적 여가박탈감, 삶의 만족도

References

  • 김계수(2010). 구조방정식 모형분석. 서울: 한나래 출판사.
  • 김정희, 김경란 ,이율희(2015). 한・중・일 장애인복지정책 비교연구. 장애인복지연구. 6(1), 115-142.
  • 나병균(2013). 한국 사회복지학의 정체성. 한국사회복지교육, 24, 101-125.
  • 방지윤(2016). 장애인 접근 가능성 재고를 위한 미술관 정책 비교-국내외 사례 비교를 중심으로. 미간행 석사학위논문. 서울대학교 대학원, 서울.
  • 백세현(2019). 장애인의 정보화 수준이 삶의 만족도에 미치는 영향. 미간행 석사학위논문. 숭실대학교 대학원, 서울.
  • 한국보건사회연구원(2024. 4월). 2023년 장애인실태조사.
  • 시즈휘, 윤석민(2024). CiteSpace 시각화 분석을 통한 중국 장애인체육 연구동향 탐색: 2004∼2023년을 중심으로. 운동재활・복지, 5(2), 11-23.
  • 왕배녕, 황향희(2024). 중국장애인의 여가제약 탐색: Q 방법론적 접근. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 48(3), 83-96.
  • 이종두, 백미연(2012). 한국의 특수성과 다문화 정책. 국제관계연구, 17(1), 335-361.
  • 자이 슈아이 슈아이, 오연풍(2016). 델파이 기법과 FAHP 분석 기법을 활용한 중국 장애인 생활체육 활성화 방안 연구. 한국체육정책학회지, 14(3), 193-210.
  • 자이 슈아이, 최규전, 신희흥, 여형일, 오연풍(2015). 중국 장애인 생활체육의 현황과 개선 방안. 전국체전기념 한국체육학회 학술발표회, 377-378.
  • 장덕진(2021). 자기결정성이론을 적용한 신체활동 참여 장애인의 기본심리욕구와 그릿(GRIT) 및 삶의 질의 관계. 미간행 박사학위논문. 경희대학교 대학원, 서울.
  • 진호남(2023). 한국과 중국의 장애인 복지정책 비교 연구. 미간행 석사학위논문, 동국대학교 대학원, 서울.
  • 한금휘(2021). 중국 장애인 관광참여 정책에 대한 연구. 미간행 박사학위논문. 우석대학교 대학원, 전북.
  • 황향희, 김보람(2020). 상대적 여가박탈의 개념화. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 44(3), 113-126.
  • 황향희, 이유진, 김보람(2021). 상대적 여가박탈 척도개발 및 타당성 검증. 한국체육학회지, 60(3), 103-114.
  • Callan, M. J., Shead, N. W., & Olson, J. M. (2011). Personal relative deprivation, delay discounting, and gambling. Journal of personality and social psychology, 101(5), 955. [https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024778]
  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations, 7(2), 117-140. [https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202]
  • Iwasaki, Y. (2003). Roles of leisure in coping with stress among university students: A repeated-assessment field study. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 16(1), 31-57. [https://doi.org/10.1080/1061580021000057022]
  • Kuykendall, L., Tay, L., & Ng, V. (2015). Leisure engagement and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 141(2), 364. [https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038508]
  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality on twentieth century England. Berkeley: Vniversity of california press.
  • Runciman, W. G. (1993). Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. Hampshire, Gregg Revivals.
  • Triandis, H. C. (2018). Individualism and collectivism. Routledge. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429499845]
  • Whyte, M. (2010). Myth of the social volcano: Perceptions of inequality and distributive injustice in contemporary China. Stanford University Press.
  • 景天魁(2011). 社情人情与福利模式——对中国大陆社会福利模式探索历程的反思. 探索与争鸣, 6(2).
  • 杨立雄(2022). 残疾人体育参与的社会性障碍 基于社会–文化视角. 上海体育大学学报, 46(3), 1-11.
  • 中国政府网（2021）. 国务院关于印发“十四五”残疾人保障和发展规划的通知 https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2021-07/21/content_5626391.htm, .
  • 刘渊(2019). 残疾人休闲需求, 参与及障碍研究(Master's thesis, 武汉科技大学).