Korean Society of Leisure, Recreation & Park
[ Article ]
Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park - Vol. 49, No. 1, pp.37-53
ISSN: 1598-0413 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Sep 2024
Received 31 Jan 2025 Revised 07 Mar 2025 Accepted 17 Mar 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26446/kjlrp.2025.3.49.1.37

대학생들의 여가활동 참여 기간과 레크리에이션 전문화의 관계에서 여가 동기의 조절 효과

정명숙1 ; 황선환2
1서울시립대학교
2서울시립대학교
The Moderating Effect of Leisure Motivation on the Relationship Between College Students' Leisure Participation Period and Recreation Specialization
Chung, Myungsook1 ; Hwang, Sunhwan2
1University of Seoul
2University of Seoul

Correspondence to: Hwang Sunhwan University of Seoul, Seoulsiripdae-ro 163, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea E-mail: shhwang@uos.ac.kr

Abstract

This study aimed to expand theoretical discussions and derive practical implications for the leisure specialization process of college students by analyzing the moderating effect of leisure motivation on the relationship between participation period and recreation specialization, based on the Situated Expectancy-Value Theory (SEVT). For data analysis, SPSS 26.0, AMOS 26.0, and PROCESS macro 3.4 Model No.1 were used to conduct frequency analysis, descriptive statistical analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, reliability analysis, correlation analysis, and moderation effect analysis. The results of the study are as follows. First, the moderating effect of motivation—enjoyment of the activity itself—on the relationship between participation period and recreation specialization was confirmed. Second, the moderating effect of motivation—benefit rewards—on the relationship was also significant. Third, the moderating effect of motivation—avoidance of disadvantages—was not significant. These findings suggest that college students' leisure experiences are not merely an accumulation of activities but rather a process shaped by the interaction of leisure motivation and environmental factors. Furthermore, since the relationship between participation period and specialization varies depending on the level and type of leisure motivation, this study highlights the necessity of tailored strategies that consider these factors.

Keywords:

Situated expectancy-value theory, Recreation specialization, Participation period, Leisure motivation, Moderating effect

키워드:

상황적 기대-가치 이론, 레크리에이션 전문화, 참여 기간, 여가 동기, 조절 효과

Acknowledgments

이 논문은 2024년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2024S1A5B5A17034825)

References

  • 김미량, 황선환(2010). 레크리에이션 전문화, 여가만족도 및 삶의 질의 관계. 한국사회체육학회지, 42(2), 1287-1294.
  • 김종호, 황선환(2018). 자전거 라이딩 참여자의 레크리에이션 전문화에 미치는 영향요인에 대한 위계적 회귀분석. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 42(4), 25-35.
  • 문화체육관광부(2023). 2023 국민여가활동조사. 문화체육관광부 연구보고서.
  • 양혜주, 황선환(2022). 추구 회피동기와 모바일 기반의 스포츠 콘텐츠 이용행동의 관계. 여가학연구 20(1): 33-46.
  • 이문진(2011). 레크리에이션 전문화 척도 개발. 국내박사학위논문, 서울대학교 대학원.
  • 이유진, 황선환(2020). 대학생의 여가참여형태에 따른 여가만족도 및 학교생활만족도. 한국융합과학회지, 9(2), 1-19.
  • 이진형(2005). 레크리에이션 전문화의 역동성: 탐조객들에 대한 패널연구. 관광학연구, 29(2), 235-254.
  • 정명숙, 황선환(2022). 웨이트트레이닝의 참여정도와 레크리에이션 전문화의 최적모형 탐색. 한국융합과학회지, 11(12), 15-30.
  • 정명숙, 황선환(2023). 여가 동기 유형에 따른 레크리에이션 전문화, 전문화 수준 향상 노력 및 전문화 의도의 차이. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 47(4), 45-57.
  • 정하나(2022). 추구-회피동기 수준에 따른 여가만족, 레크리에이션 전문화, 행복의 관계: 야구동호인을 대상으로. 국내박사학위논문, 서울시립대학교, 일반대학원.
  • 황선환(2010). 대학생의 여가 동기 유형에 따른 레크리에이션 전문화 과정의 구조모형 분석. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 34(2), 47-57.
  • Beard, J. G., & Ragheb, M. G. (1983). Measuring leisure motivation. Journal of leisure research, 15(3), 219-228. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1983.11969557]
  • Bryan, H. (1977). Leisure value systems and recreational specialization: The case of trout fishermen. Journal of leisure research, 9(3), 174-187. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1977.11970328]
  • Bryan, H. (2000). Recreation specialization revisited. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(1), 18-21. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2000.11949879]
  • Cho, S. J., Kono, S., & Ito, E. (2024). The paths to subjective and eudaimonic well-being: which aspects of leisure matter?. Leisure/Loisir, 1-33. [https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2024.2420134]
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Conceptualizations of intrinsic motivation and self-determination. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior, 11-40. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7_2]
  • Deursen, J., Creany, N., Smith, B., Freimund, W., Avgar, T., & Monz, C. A. (2024). Recreation specialization: Resource selection functions as a predictive tool for protected area recreation management. Applied Geography, 167, 103276. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103276]
  • Ditton, R. B., Loomis, D. K., & Choi, S. (1992). Recreation specialization: Re-conceptualization from a social worlds perspective. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(1), 33-51. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1992.11969870]
  • Donnelly, M. P., Vaske, J. J., & Graefe, A. R. (1986). Degree and range of recreation specialization: Toward a typology of boating related activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 18(2), 81-95. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1986.11969648]
  • Eccles, J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J., and Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In Spence, J. T. (ed.)Achievement and Achievement Motives, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco
  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary educational psychology, 61, 101859. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859]
  • Gordan, M., & Krishanan, I. A. (2014). A review of BF Skinner’s ‘Reinforcement Theory of Motivation’. International journal of research in education methodology, 5(3), 680-688. [https://doi.org/10.24297/ijrem.v5i3.3892]
  • Harackiewicz, J. M. (1979), The effects of reqard contingency and performance feedback on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8): 1352-1361. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1352]
  • Heidari, K., Heydarinejad, S., Saffari, M., & Khatibi, A. (2021). Investigating the leisure behavior of Iranians: the structural model of serious leisure, recreation specialization and place attachment. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 13(1), 77-93. [https://doi.org/10.1080/19407963.2019.1694030]
  • Jones, C. D., Hollenhorst, S. J., Perna, F., & Selin, S. (2000). Validation of the flow theory in an on-site whitewater kayaking setting. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(2), 247-261. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2000.11949916]
  • Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British journal of applied science & technology, 7(4), 396. [https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975]
  • Lee, J. H., & Scott, D. (2006). For better or worse? A structural model of the benefits and costs associated with recreational specialization. Leisure Sciences, 28(1), 17-38. [https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400590962461]
  • Liu, H. L. S., & Wu, I. C. N. (2024). Crawling with a vehicle: Rock-crawlers’ recreation specialization, motivation, and sources of challenges. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 45, 100708. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2023.100708]
  • Misra, R., & McKean, M. (2000). College students' academic stress and its relation to their anxiety, time management, and leisure satisfaction. American journal of Health studies, 16(1), 41.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(5), 749. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749]
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67. [https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020]
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68. [https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68]
  • Saleh, D., Camart, N., & Romo, L. (2017). Predictors of stress in college students. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 19. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00019]
  • Scott, D., Cavin, D. A., & Shafer, C. S. (2007). Toward a new understanding of recreational specialization. 休閒與遊憩 研究, 1(2), 1-23.
  • Scott, D., & Shafer, C. S. (2001). Recreational specialization: A critical look at the construct. Journal of leisure research, 33(3), 319-343. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2001.11949944]
  • Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advances in experimental social psychology/Academic Press. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2]
  • Walker, G. J., & Wang, X. (2008). A cross-cultural comparison of Canadian and Mainland Chinese university students' leisure motivations. Leisure Sciences, 30(3), 179-197. [https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400802014420]
  • White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. Psychological review, 66(5), 297. [https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040934]
  • Ye, W. (2024). An empirical study on the relationship between rider recreational specialization, individual-environment fit, and heart flow experience. Heliyon, 10(11). [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31781]