Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
Korean Society of Leisure, Recreation & Park
[ Article ]
Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park - Vol. 46, No. 4, pp.51-65
ISSN: 1598-0413 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Dec 2022
Received 09 Nov 2022 Revised 17 Dec 2022 Accepted 27 Dec 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26446/kjlrp.2022.12.46.4.51

건강행동과정접근(HAPA)모델을 적용한 여가시간 신체활동(LTPA) 참여자의 행동과정 검증

김보람1
1고려대학교 연구교수
Action process verification of participants in leisure time physical activity (LTPA) applying the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) model
Kim, Bo-Ram1
1Korea University

Correspondence to: Kim, Bo-Ram E-mail: brh@naver.com

Abstract

This study verified the leisure time physical activity process of adults by applying the HAPA model in order to provide basic data for establishing strategies for vitalizing leisure time physical activity. The subjects of this study were adults who were participating in physical activities in their leisure time at sports centers and cultural centers in Seoul and Gyeonggi Province as the population. After distributing 450 questionnaires using the convenience sampling method, 390 copies were used for the final analysis. Frequency analysis, descriptive statistical analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, reliability analysis, and structural equation modeling were performed using SPSS 27.0 and AMOS 24.0 programs. The conclusions drawn through these research procedures are as follows. First, perceived self-efficacy and outcome expectancies were found to have a positive effect on physical activity intention, but risk perception had no effect. Next, physical activity intention and maintenance self-efficacy were found to have a positive effect on planning, and maintenance self-efficacy was shown to have a positive effect on recovery self-efficacy. Finally, recovery self-efficacy and physical activity planning were found to have a positive effect on LTPA. Based on this, strategies to encourage physical activity should be sought for those who find it difficult to start or maintain physical activity despite the many benefits and recommendations of physical activity.

Keywords:

health action process approach(HAPA) model, leisure time physical activity, self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, risk perception

키워드:

건강행동과정접근(HAPA) 모델, 여가시간 신체활동, 자기효능감, 성과기대, 위험지각

Acknowledgments

이 논문 또는 저서는 2019년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2019S1A5B5A07110384)

References

  • 김계수(2010). 구조방정식 모형 분석. 서울: 한나래 아카데미.
  • 김기형, 박중길(2016). 건강행동과정접근(HAPA) 모델을 이용한 성인들의 신체활동 변화 예측. 한국스포츠심리학회지, 27(1), 51-69.
  • 김보람, 김매이, 윤소영(2020). 노인의 행복감에 미치는 영향요인 연구: 2018 국민생활체육참여실태조사를 이용한 성별 분석. 한국체육학회지, 59(1), 253-266.
  • 김보람, 천승현(2018). 계획행동이론(TPB)으로 본 대학생들의 교양체육에 대한 인식과 의도, 그리고 여가시간 운동행동 간의 관계. 한국체육학회지, 57(1), 305-319.
  • 김보람, 천승현(2019). 대학생들의 운동의도와 여가시간 신체활동 간의 관계에서 극복계획과 실행계획의 매개역할. 한국체육학회지, 58(1), 217-228.
  • 김보람, 황향희, 백소라(2017). 계획행동이론(TPB)에 기초한 여가교육이 중년여성의 건강인식 및 생성감에 미치는 영향. 한국체육학회지, 56(1), 589-612.
  • 김영호(2004). 대학생들의 운동행동변화의 단계에 영향을 주는 심리적 변인. 한국스포츠심리학회지, 15(4), 18-50.
  • 문화체육관광부(2021). 2021 국민여가활동조사. 문화체육관광부 연구보고서.
  • 박진우(2016). 지체장애인의 신체활동 참여과정 분석을 위한 HAPA-PD 모형 검증. 미간행 박사학위논문, 부산대학교 대학원, 부산.
  • 변준석(2021). 유튜브 운동 콘텐츠 시청자의 운동지속과정 검증에 관한 연구: 건강행동과정접근 모형을 이용하여. 미간행 석사학위논문, 성균관대교 대학원, 서울.
  • 변준석, 신원미, 장경로(2022). 유튜브 운동 콘텐츠 시청 대학생의 운동지속과정 검증에 관한 연구: 건강행동과정접근모형을 이용하여. 한국교육문제연구, 40(1), 175-196.
  • 송지준(2019). 논문통계의 이해와 적용(SPSS와 AMOS를 활용). 서울: 21세기사
  • 최윤, 양숙자, 송혜영(2018). 신체활동에 대한 건강행동과정접근모델(Health Action Process Approach Model) 관련 변인의 효과: 체계적 문헌고찰 및 메타분석. 지역사회간호학회지, 29(3), 359-370.
  • 푸창(2019). 대학생의 과거 습관, 의도와 운동행동과의 관계에서 유지 자기효능감과 행동통제의 조절된 매개효과. 한국스포츠심리학회지, 30(3), 73-84.
  • Araujo-Soarea, V., McIntyre, T., MacLennan, G., & Sniehotta, F. F. (2009). Predicting changes in physical activity amongst adolescents: The role of self-efficacy, intention, action planning and coping planning. Health Education Research, 24, 128-139. [https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyn005]
  • Arbour-Nicitopoulos, K. P., Duncan, M., Remington, G., Cairney, J., & Faulkner, G. E. (2014). Development and reliability testing of a health action process approach inventory for physical activity participation among individuals with schizophrenia. Frontiers in psychiatry, 5, 68. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00068]
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Fearful expectations and avoidant actions as coeffects of perceived self-inefficacy. American Psychologist, 41(12), 1389–1391. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.12.1389]
  • Barg, C. J., Latimer, A. E., Pomery, E. A., Rivers, S. E., Rench,T. A., Prapavessis, H., & Salovey, P. (2012). Examining predictors of physical activity among inactive middle-aged women: An application of the health action process approach. Psychology and Health, 27(7),829-845. [https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.609595]
  • Berli, C., Loretini, P., Radtke, T., Hornung, R., & Scholz, U. (2014). Predicting physical activity in adolescents: The role of compensatory health beliefs within the Health Action Process Approach. Psychology & Health, 29(4), 458-474. [https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2013.865028]
  • Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B., Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., McCaul, K. D., & Weinstein, N. D. (2007). Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination. Health Psychology, 26(2), 136. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136]
  • Caudroit, J., Stephan, Y., & Le Scanff, C. (2011). Social cognitive determinants of physical activity among retired older individuals: An application of the health action process approach. British Journal of Health Psychology, 16(2), 404-417. [https://doi.org/10.1348/135910710X518324]
  • Ferguson, B. (2014). ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription 9th Ed. 2014. The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association, 58(3), 328.
  • Fernandez, B. R., Fleig, L., Godinho, C. A., Montenegro, E. M., Knoll, N., Schwarzer, R. (2015). Action control bridges the planning behaviour gap: Alongitudinal study on physical exercise in young adults. Psychology & Health. 30(8), 911-923 [https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2015.1006222]
  • Gopinath, B., Hardy, LL., Baur, L. A., Burlutsky, G., & Mitchell, P. (2012). Physical activity and sedentary behaviors and health-related quality of life in adolescents. Pediatrics, 130(1), e167-e174. [https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-3637]
  • Gu, X., Chang, M., & Solmon M. A. (2016). Physical activity, physical fitness, and health-related quality of life in school-aged children. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 35, 117-126. [https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2015-0110]
  • Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. (2009). Integrating the theory of planned behaviour and self & #8208; determination theory in health behaviour: A meta‐ analysis. British journal of health psychology, 14(2), 275-302. [https://doi.org/10.1348/135910708X373959]
  • Hardcastle, S. J., Maxwell-Smith, C., & Hagger, M. S. (2021). Predicting physical activity change in cancer survivors: An application of the Health Action Process Approach. Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 1-8. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01107-6]
  • Hattar, A., Pal, S., & Hagger, M. S. (2016). Predicting physical activity‐related outcomes in overweight and obese adults: A health action process approach. Applied Psychology: Health and wellbeing, 8(1), 127-151. [https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12065]
  • Hubbard, J., & Mannell, R. C. (2001). Testing competing models of the leisure constraint negotiation process in a corporate employee recreation setting. Leisure sciences, 23(3), 145-163. [https://doi.org/10.1080/014904001316896846]
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.(3rd. Ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Kosma, M., Ellis, R., Cardinal, B. J., Bauer, J. J., & McCubbin, J. (2007). The mediating role of intention and stages of change in physical activity among adults with physical disabilities. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 29(1), 21-38. [https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.29.1.21]
  • Marlatt, G. A., Baer, J. S., & Quigley, L. A. (1995). Self-efficacy and addictive behavior. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in changing societies (pp. 289–315). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527692.012]
  • McKay, C. D., Merrett, C. K., & Emery, C. A. (2016). Predictors of FIFA 11+ implementation intention in female adolescent soccer: an application of the health action process approach (HAPA) model. International journal of environmental research and public health, 13(7), 657. [https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13070657]
  • Mohammadi Zeidi, I., Morshedi, H., & Shokohi, A. (2021). Predicting psychological factors affecting regular physical activity in hypertensive patients: Application of health action process approach model. Nursing Open, 8(1), 442-452. [https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.645]
  • Mutrie, N., Biddle, S. J. H., & Gorely, T. (2015). Psychology of physical activity. Florence: Taylor and Francis.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd Edit). New York : McGraw-Hill.
  • Parschau, L., Barz, M., Richert, J., Knoll, N., Lippke, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2014). Physical activity among adults with obesity: testing the Health Action Process Approach. Rehabilitation psychology, 59(1), 42. [https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035290]
  • Plotnikoff, R. C., Blanchard, C., Hotz, S. B., & Rhodes, R. (2001). Validation of the decisional balance scales in the exercise domain from the transtheoretical model: A longitudinal test. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 5(4), 191-206. [https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327841MPEE0504_01]
  • Rivis, A., & Sheeran, P. (2003). Social influences and the theory of planned behaviour: Evidence for a direct relationship between prototypes and young people's exercise behaviour. Psychology & Health, 18(5), 567-583. [https://doi.org/10.1080/0887044032000069883]
  • Scholz, U., Schüz, B., Ziegelmann, J. P., Lippke, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2008). Beyond behavioural intentions: Planning mediates between intentions and physical activity. British journal of health psychology, 13(3), 479-494. [https://doi.org/10.1348/135910707X216062]
  • Scholz, U., Sniehotta, F. F., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). Predicting physical exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: The role of phase-specific self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 27(2), 135-151. [https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.27.2.135]
  • Schwarzer, R. (2008). Modeling health behaviour change: how to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Applied Psychology, 57, 1-29. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00325.x]
  • Schwarzer, R. (2011). Health behavior change. In H. S. Friedman (Ed.), Oxford handbook of health psychology (pp. 591-611). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195342819.013.0024]
  • Schwarzer, R., & Luszczynska, A. (2008). How to overcome health-compromising behaviors: The health action process approach. (2), 141-151. [https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.13.2.141]
  • Sneihotta, F. F., Scholz, U., Lippke, S., Ziegelmann, J. & Luszczynska, A. (2003). Phase-specific self-efficacy of health behavior change. Unpublished manuscript, Free University Berlin.
  • Sniehotta, F. F. (2009). Towards a theory of intentional behavior change: plans, planning, and self-regulation. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 261-273. [https://doi.org/10.1348/135910708X389042]
  • Sniehotta, F. F., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). Bridging the intention–behaviour gap: Planning, self-efficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise. Psychology & health, 20(2), 143-160. [https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440512331317670]
  • Tremblay, M. S., Barnes, J., & Janson, K. (2015). The biggest risk is keeping kids indoors: The 2015 ParticipACTION report card on physical activity for children and youth. ParticipACTION.
  • World Health Organization(WHO) (2010). Global recommendation on physical activity for health. Retrieved 18/11/2012, 2012, from http://www.who.int, .