Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
Korean Society of Leisure, Recreation & Park
[ Article ]
Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park - Vol. 44, No. 3, pp.1-13
ISSN: 1598-0413 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Sep 2020
Received 29 Jul 2020 Revised 03 Sep 2020 Accepted 17 Sep 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26446/kjlrp.2020.9.44.3.1

한강공원 방문객의 회복환경지각이 장소애착심에 미치는 영향: 주의회복이론을 중심으로

윤지인1 ; 김지혜2
1경희대학교 교수
2이화여자대학교 강사
The influence of the perception of restorative environment on place attachment for visitors to Han River Park: grounded on Attention Restoration Theory
Yoon, Jee In1 ; Kim, Ji-Hye2
1Kyung Hee University
2Ewha Womans University

Correspondence to: Kim, Ji-Hye 52, Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemoon-gu, Seoul, Korea E-mail: jiji1024@hanmail.net

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between the perception of restorative environment and place attachment at Han River Park. The theoretical framework for this research is Attention Restoration Theory(ART) initially suggested by Kaplan and his colleagues. We collected the data at the park and finally yielded 633 surveys from the visitors. We performed the correlation analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and path analysis using SPSS 23.0 and Lisrel 8.70. The results showed that a) compatibility positively predicted place identity, b) coherence and compatibility positively influenced place dependence, c) compatibility positively influenced affective attachment, and d) fascination and being away positively predicted social bonding. Among the dimensions of the perception of restorative environment, compatibility was most distinctive predictor of place attachment. Relied on the results suggested by this study, managers and practitioners could make a visitor-oriented management decision to improve the restorative quality of Han River Park.

Keywords:

attention restoration theory, restorative environment, place attachment, han river park

키워드:

주의회복이론, 회복환경, 장소애착심, 한강공원

References

  • 강영애, 이지윤, 이수(2013). 수변공원에서의 회복환경지각이 여가만족도에 미치는 영향. 한강공원을 중심으로. 관광연구, 28(3), 353-373.
  • 강효민, 남재화(2000). 야외 스포츠 활동 참가와 자유인지 및 여가만족의 관계. 한국스포츠사회학회지, 13(1), 13-24.
  • 김무한(2015). 주의회복환경에서 본 행태의 장에 관한 연구: 서울 청계천을 중심으로. 미간행 박사학위논문. 서울대학교 환경대학원.
  • 김지혜, 원형중, 김미혜(2011). 한강공원의 자전거이용자와 도보산책자간의 레저갈등. 한국체육학회지, 50(5), 285-294.
  • 김진옥(2015). 자연기반 아웃도어 레크리에이션 환경이 치유관광객의 주의회복과 삶의 질에 미치는 영향: '치유의 숲' 프로그램 참여자를 대상으로. 미간행 박사학위논문, 한양대학교 일반대학원.
  • 박민아(2016). 리조트 서비스스케이프, 회복환경지각, 여가만족의 구조적 관계에 관한 연구. 미간행 박사학위논문. 경기대학교 일반대학원.
  • 박민아, 윤세목(2018). 리조트 서비스스케이프, 회복환경지각, 여가만족의 구조적 관계 연구. 관광경영연구, 22(4), 447-474.
  • 반영운, 윤중석, 정재호, 이태호, 정헌근, 백종인(2008). 광역권 근린공원의 이용실태 및 만족도 분석: 청주시의 구룡공원을 대상으로. 도시행정학보, 21(3), 185-203.
  • 백영민(2017). R를 이용한 사회과학데이터분석: 구조방정식모형 분석, 고급편. 서울: 커뮤니케이션북스.
  • 송지연, 박진아(2013). 한강시민공원의 이용자 활동 특성 분석 및 개선방안 연구: 반포한강공원과 여의도한강공원을 중심으로. 한국도시설계학회지, 14(4), 43-54.
  • 엄영숙, 오형나(2019). 미세먼지 건강위험과 회피행동: 야외여가활동수요 감소를 사례로. 경제학연구, 67(2), 39-70.
  • 이승훈, 현명호(2003). 한국판 회복환경지각척도의 요인구조. 한국심리학회지, 8(2), 229-241.
  • 최이규(2005). 구조방정식모형. 서울: 무역경영상.
  • 최정우(2008). 중요도-성취도 분석을 활용한 한강공원 관리운영방안. 도시행정학보, 21(3), 135-155.
  • 최현욱, 이민석(2018). 여가활동 참여 액티브 시니어의 여가촉진, 여가태도 및 여가제약협상의 구조적 관계. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 42(4), 13-24.
  • 한수정, 조용준(2010). 여가활동 변화에 따른 여가정책방향에 관한 연구. GRI 연구논총, 12(1), 213-232.
  • 홍세희(2000). 구조방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 근거. 한국심리학회지, 19(1), 61-177.
  • Bell, P., Greene, T., Fisher, J. & Baum, A. (2001). Environmental Psychology: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance test and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588]
  • Drenthen, M. (2009). Ecological restoration and place attachment: emplacing non-places?. Environmental Values, 18(3), 285-312. [https://doi.org/10.3197/096327109X12474739376451]
  • Hartig, T., Kaiser, F. G., & Bowler, P. A. (1997a). Further Development of a Measure of Perceived Environmental Restorativeness (Working Paper No. 5). Gavle, Sweden: Uppsala University, Institute for Housing Research, 5, 1-19.
  • Hartig, T., Korpela, K., Evans, G., & Garling, T. (1997b). A Measure of Restorative Quality in Environments. Scandinavian Housing & Planning Research, 14, 175-194 [https://doi.org/10.1080/02815739708730435]
  • Hidalgo, M. C., & Hernandez, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 273-281. [https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0221]
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underpara-meterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424-453. [https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424]
  • Kaplan, S. (1995). The Restorative Benefits of Nature: Toward an Integrative Framework. Journal of Environment Psychology, 15(3), 169-182. [https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2]
  • Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press
  • Korpela, K., & Hartig, T. (1996). Restorative qualities of favorite places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(3), 221-233. [https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0018]
  • Kyle, G., Graefe, A., Manning, R., & Bacon, J. (2004a). Effects of place attachment on users’ perceptions of social and environmental conditions in a natural setting. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 213-225. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.006]
  • Kyle, G. T., Mowen, A. J., & Tarrant, M. (2004b). Linking place preferences with place meaning: An examination of the relationship between place motivation and place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 439-454. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.11.001]
  • MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-149. [https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130]
  • Mayfield, M. (2011). A place just right: Effects of place attachment on preference for restorative environments. Award Winning Psychology Papers. 1-22. [https://doi.org/10.1037/e592532011-005]
  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Rosenbaum, M. S., & Massiah, C. (2011). An expanded servicescape perspective. Journal of Service Management, 22(4), 471-490. [https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231111155088]
  • Rosenbaum, M. S., Sweeney, J. C., & Windhorst, C. (2009). The restorative Qualities of an Activity-Based, Third Place Cafe for Seniors: Restoration, Social support, and Placa Attachmenr at Mather’s-more than a cafe. Senior Housing & Care Journal. 17(1). 39-54.
  • Rosenbaum, M. S., Sweeney, J. C., & Massiah, C. (2014). The restorative potential of senior centers. Managing Service Quality. 24(4). 363-383. [https://doi.org/10.1108/MSQ-11-2013-0264]
  • Soga, M., & Gaston, K. J. (2016). Extinction of experience: the loss of human–nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(2), 94-101. [https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1225]