Korean Society of Leisure, Recreation & Park
[ Article ]
Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park - Vol. 49, No. 4, pp.85-96
ISSN: 1598-0413 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Dec 2025
Received 27 Oct 2025 Revised 27 Nov 2025 Accepted 19 Dec 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26446/kjlrp.2025.12.49.4.85

여가유형에 따른 행복본질주의 신념과 주관적 웰빙의 관계

주진영1 ; 최인철2 ; 신규리3
1서울대학교 행복연구센터 박사후연구원
2서울대학교 교수
3서울과학기술대학교 교수
The Effect of Essentialist Beliefs about Happiness on Subjective Well-Being: A Moderation Analysis of Leisure Type
Joo, Jinyoung1 ; Choi, Incheol2 ; Shin, Kyulee3
1Center for Happiness Studies
2Seoul National University
3Seoul National University of Science & Technology

Correspondence to: Choi, Incheol E-mail: ichoi@snu.ac.kr

Abstract

This study aimed to examine whether the relationship between the sub-factors of Essentialist Beliefs about Happiness (EBH) and Subjective Well-Being (SWB) varies depending on the type of leisure activity (active vs. passive). Using a panel data (N = 429), Data were analyzed through descriptive statistics, correlation analysis (SPSS 27.0), and Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R 4.2.1 to evaluate the measurement and structural models.

Results showed that the belief that happiness is immutable(EBH_im) was negatively associated with SWB, while effort-based beliefs positively predicted SWB. Notably, EBH_effort interacted with leisure type, such that individuals who believed happiness could be improved through effort experienced higher SWB when engaged in active leisure. These findings suggest that EBH is not uniformly detrimental; effort-oriented beliefs may serve as motivational resources that enhance well-being through active engagement. This study extends leisure research by integrating dispositional belief systems into models of well-being and offers practical implications for developing psychologically informed, personalized leisure and happiness-promotion programs.

Keywords:

essentialist beliefs about happiness(EBH), leisure type, subjective well-being, happiness

키워드:

행복본질주의(EBH), 여가유형, 주관적 웰빙, 행복

Acknowledgments

본 연구는 서울대학교 행복연구센터의 지원을 받아 수행되었음(No. 0404-20210003).

References

  • 구자영, 서은국(2007). 행복의 양이 한정되어 있다는 믿음과 주관적 안녕감. 한국심리학회지 : 사회 및 성격, 21, 1-19.
  • 유재경(2015). 행복에 대한 본질주의적 믿음이 웰빙에 미치는 영향. 석사학위논문, 서울대학교 대학원
  • 이진현(2018). 행복에 대한 본질주의적 신념이 행복한 사람에 대한 선호에 미치는 영향. 석사학위논문, 서울대학교 대학원.
  • 이한나, 권진, 최윤정(2025). 여가인식과 행복감의 관계: 빈곤·비빈곤 노인의 문화여가활동 유형별 매개효과. 한국웰니스학회지 20(2), 329-337.
  • 이현희, 김은정, 이민규 (2003). 한국판 정적 정서 및 부적 정서 척도의 타당화 연구. 한국심리학회지 : 임상, 22, 935-946.
  • 문화체육관광부(2022). 2022 국민여가활동조사. 문화체육관광부.
  • Bartels, M. (2015). Genetics of wellbeing and its components satisfaction with life, happiness, and quality of life: A review and meta-analysis of heritability studies. Behavior genetics, 45(2), 137-156. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-015-9713-y]
  • Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(8), 917-927. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.8.917]
  • Caldwell, L. L. (2005). Leisure and Health: Why Is Leisure Therapeutic? British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 33, 7-26. [https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880412331335939]
  • Caldwell, L. L. (2005). Leisure and health: Why is leisure therapeutic? British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 33(1), 7-26. [https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880412331335939]
  • Cho, D., Post, J., & Kim, S. K. (2018). Comparison of passive and active leisure activities and life satisfaction with aging. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 18(3), 380–386. [https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13188]
  • Choi, I., Yu, J., Lee, J., & Choi, E. (2021). Essentializing happiness reduces one’s motivation to be happier. Journal of Personality, 89(3), 437-450. [https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12589]
  • Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: basic issues inobjective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319. [https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309]
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. [https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01]
  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75. [https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13]
  • Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61(4), 305. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.305]
  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276]
  • Dowds, B. (2012). Why we can’t be whoever we want to be: The biological limits to change. Éisteach: The Journal of the Irish Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy, Summer, 13–17.
  • Fancourt, D., Aughterson, H., Finn, S., Walker, E., & Steptoe, A. (2021). How leisure activities affect health: a narrative review and multi-level theoretical framework of mechanisms of action. The Lancet Psychiatry, 8(4), 329-339. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30384-9]
  • Fassett-Carman, A., Hankin, B. L., & Snyder, H. R. (2019). Stress generation and depression: The role of cognitive vulnerabilities. Journal of Affective Disorders, 256, 568–576.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. [https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800313]
  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218]
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7]
  • Haslam, N., Bastian, B., & Bissett, M. (2004). Essentialist beliefs about personality and their implications. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(12), 1661-1673. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271182]
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
  • Holder, M. D., Coleman, B., & Sehn, Z. (2009). The Contribution of Active and Passive Leisure to Children’s Well‐Being. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 378-386. [https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105308101676]
  • Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1980). The social psychology of leisure and recreation. Wm. C. Brown.
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Ku, X., Cha, S. E., Kim, Y., Jun, Y. J., & Choi, I. (2024). Essentializing happiness mitigates the changes in subjective well-being following negative life events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 01461672241279657. [https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672241279657]
  • Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 541-572. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x]
  • Lyubomirsky, S. & Ross, L. (1997). Hedonic consequences of social comparison: a contrast of happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1141– 1157. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1141]
  • Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of general psychology, 9(2), 111-131. [https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.111]
  • Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2016). Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience. Psychological Review, 123(4), 349–367. [https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000033]
  • Minkov, M., & Bond, M. H. (2017). A genetic component to national differences in happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(2), 321-340. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9712-y]
  • Neulinger, J. (1981). The psychology of leisure (2nd ed.). Charles C. Thomas.
  • Pavot, W. (2018). The cornerstone of research on subjective well-being: Valid assessment methodology. In E. Diener, S. Oishi, & L. Tay (Eds.), Handbook of well-being (Noba Scholar Handbook Series: Subjective Well-Being). DEF Publishers. https://nobascholar.com
  • Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (2008). The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137–152. [https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760701756946]
  • Shin, K., & You, S. (2013). Leisure Type, Leisure Satisfaction and Adolescents’ Psychological Well-being. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 7(2) 53-62. [https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2013.6]
  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063]