Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
Korean Society of Leisure, Recreation & Park
[ Article ]
Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park - Vol. 48, No. 3, pp.83-96
ISSN: 1598-0413 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Sep 2024
Received 31 Jul 2024 Revised 30 Aug 2024 Accepted 17 Sep 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26446/kjlrp.2024.6.48.3.83

중국장애인의 여가제약 탐색: Q 방법론적 접근

왕배녕1 ; 황향희2
1강원대학교 박사과정
2강원대학교 교수
Exploring the Leisure Constraints of People with Disabilities in China: Q Methodological Approach
Wang, Pei-Ning1 ; Hwang, Hyang-Hee2
1Department of Smart Health Science and Technology, Kangwon National University
2Department of Smart Health Science and Technology, Kangwon National University

Correspondence to: Hwang, Hyang-Hee E-mail: phyhee@kangwon.ac.kr

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the types and characteristics of leisure constraints of Chinese disabled people. This study used Q methodology, and 29 Q-samples and 17 P-samples of Chinese disabled people were used for analysis. The collected data were analyzed using the QUANL.PC program. The results of the study are as follows. There are five types of leisure constraints of Chinese disabled people. The characteristics of each type are ‘work-centered leisure constraints’ (type 1), ‘leisure constraints due to absence of friends’ (type 2), ‘leisure constraints due to time and distance obstacles’ (type 3), ‘leisure constraints due to absence of family’ (type 4), and ‘leisure constraints due to safety concerns’ (type 5). Each type deals with work stress, lack of social interaction, time and distance constraints, lack of family support, and safety concerns about leisure activities. To overcome these constraints, it is important to balance work and leisure, and government and social support are needed. The following suggestions are made for the participation of disabled people in leisure activities in China. Policy efforts are needed, such as developing adaptive leisure activities and transportation support, providing educational information services, supporting policies, strengthening safety measures, building volunteer networks, and urging people to improve their awareness of disabilities. It is hoped that these efforts will help people with disabilities in China participate more actively in leisure activities, promote social inclusion and understanding, and improve the quality of life for people with disabilities.

Keywords:

Chinese Disabled Persons, Leisure Constraints, Q-Methodology

키워드:

중국장애인, 여가제약, Q 방법론

References

  • 김기운(2022).　부르디외 자본론으로 해석한 장애인스포츠의 공간적 차별. 한국스포츠사회학회지, 35(1), 37-54.
  • 김기운(2024). ‘불편한 손님’: 스포츠 공간에서 신체장애인의 억압적 경험 탐색. 한국스포츠사회학회지, 37(1), 1-14.
  • 김병철(2019). 중국장애인연합회의 「베리어프리의 통용을 추진하는 베이징 선언」. 세계장애동향 연구보고서. 46호. 4-6, 한국장애인고용공단 고용개발원.
  • 김용준, 이성대, 염동문(2012).　매개된 조절효과를 통한 직무스트레스가 생활만족도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 한국장애인복지학, 19, 111-130.
  • 김은빈(2024). Q방법론을 활용한 교육대학원 상담 전공 학생의 진학동기 유형분석. 열린교육연구, 32(3), 201-223.
  • 김최환(2024. 7. 9일자). 장애인과 비장애인의 사회통합을 위한 촉매제로서 배리어프리 스포츠. 체육시민연대 주간 브리핑, 2024년 제28호.
  • 김흥규(2008). Q-블럭과 Q-도구의 일치도 연구. 주관성 연구, 16, 5-16.
  • 박도순(2001). 교육연구방법론. 서울:문음사.
  • 신진호, 홍서윤(2022). 장애인의 여가활동 유형화와 유형별 특성 연구: 여가제약을 중심으로. 한국사회정책, 29(2), 225-253.
  • 원형중(1998). 여가 레크리에이션: 성인근로자의 여가활동 참여동기와 제약요인에 관한 기본 연구. 한국체육학회지, 37(2), 369-386.
  • 이도희(2005). Q 방법을 활용한 장애 인식에 대한 연구. 사회연구, 6(2), 109-138.
  • 정재현, 김혜민, 이현수(2019). 통합수영에 대한 비장애 학생의 태도 유형 분석. 한국특수체육학회지, 27(1), 47-59.
  • 주연선(2004). 장애인의 여가제약, 여가권태가 음주행태에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 서울시 영구임대아파트 단지를 중심으로. 미간행 석사학위논문. 연세대학교 사회복지대학원, 서울.
  • 허창덕(2017). 중국 장애인의 소외의식에 관한 연구-강소성 거주 장애인을 대상으로-. 중국과 중국학. 제31호, 1-32.
  • 황향희, 노용구, 박선기, 오세이, 이주연, & 김영재(2008). 여가학총론. 서울: 레인보우북스.
  • Anderssen, N., & Wold, B. (1992). Parental and peer influences on leisure-time physical activity in young adolescents. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 63(4), 341-348. [https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1992.10608754]
  • Bezyak, J. L., Sabella, S., Hammel, J., McDonald, K., Jones, R. A., & Barton, D.(2020). Community participation and public transportation barriers experienced by people with disabilities. Disability and rehabilitation, 42(23), 3275-3283. [https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2019.1590469]
  • Burns, N., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S. (2009). The private roots of public action: Gender, equality, and political participation. In The Private Roots of Public Action. Harvard University Press. [https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1pncpnf]
  • Coleman, D., & Iso-Ahola, S. E.(1993). Leisure and health: The role of social support and self-determination. Journal of leisure research, 25(2), 111-128. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1993.11969913]
  • Crawford, D. W., & Godbey, G.(1987). Reconceptualizing barriers to family leisure. Leisure sciences, 9(2), 119-127. [https://doi.org/10.1080/01490408709512151]
  • Flora, J., & Segrin, C. (1998). Joint leisure time in friend and romantic relationships: The role of activity type, social skills and positivity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(5), 711-718. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598155009]
  • Griffith, J. R., Clasey, J. L., King, J. T., Gantz, S., Kryscio, R. J., & Bada, H. S. (2007). Role of parents in determining children’s physical activity. World J Pediatr, 3(4), 265-70.
  • Henderson, K. A., Bedini, L. A., Hecht, L., & Schuler, R. (1995). Women with physical disabilities and the negotiation of leisure constraints. Leisure studies, 14(1), 17-31. [https://doi.org/10.1080/02614369500390021]
  • Ho, C. H.(2022). It is more than fun and making friends: Social leisure and leisure experiences of Taiwanese urban women. Journal of Leisure Research, 53(4), 556-574. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2022.2073189]
  • Ihle, A., Oris, M., Baeriswyl, M., & Kliegel, M. (2018). The relation of close friends to cognitive performance in old age: The mediating role of leisure activities. International Psychogeriatrics, 30(12), 1753-1758. [https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610218000789]
  • Kars, C., Hofman, M., Geertzen, J. H., Pepping, G.-J., & Dekker, R. (2009). Participation in sports by lower limb amputees in the Province of Drenthe, The Netherlands. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 33(4), 356-367. [https://doi.org/10.3109/03093640902984579]
  • Lin, D., Levy, S., & Campbell, F. K. (2024). Using the Perspective of ‘Peopleship’To Conceptualise Disability in China. In The Routledge Handbook of Postcolonial Disability Studies (pp. 38-49). Routledge. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003310709-6]
  • Martin, J. J.(2013). Benefits and barriers to physical activity for individuals with disabilities: a social-relational model of disability perspective. Disability and rehabilitation, 35(24), 2030-2037. [https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2013.802377]
  • McDavid, L., Cox, A. E., & Amorose, A. J. (2012). The relative roles of physical education teachers and parents in adolescents’ leisure-time physical activity motivation and behavior. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(2), 99-107. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.10.003]
  • Melbøe, L., & Ytterhus, B.(2017). Disability leisure: in what kind of activities, and when and how do youths with intellectual disabilities participate?. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 19(3), 245-255. [https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2016.1264467]
  • Rimmer, J. H. (2005). The conspicuous absence of people with disabilities in public fitness and recreation facilities: lack of interest or lack of access?. American Journal of Health Promotion, 19(5), 327-329. [https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-19.5.327]
  • Rimmer, J. H., Riley, B., Wang, E., Rauworth, A., & Jurkowski, J.(2004). Physical activity participation among persons with disabilities: barriers and facilitators. American journal of preventive medicine, 26(5), 419-425. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.02.002]
  • Rimmer, J. H., Padalabalanarayanan, S., Malone, L. A., & Mehta, T.(2017). Fitness facilities still lack accessibility for people with disabilities. Disability and health journal, 10(2), 214-221. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.12.011]
  • Saitta, M., Devan, H., Boland, P., & Perry, M. A. (2019). Park-based physical activity interventions for persons with disabilities: A mixed-methods systematic review. Disability and Health Journal, 12(1), 11-23. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.07.006]
  • Scelza, W. M., Kalpakjian, C. Z., Zemper, E. D., & Tate, D. G. (2005). Perceived barriers to exercise in people with spinal cord injury. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 84(8), 576-583. [https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000171172.96290.67]
  • Taliaferro, A. R., & Hammond, L. (2016). “I don’t have time”: Barriers and facilitators to physical activity for adults with intellectual disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 33(2), 113-133. [https://doi.org/10.1123/APAQ.2015-0050]
  • Tasiemski, T., Kennedy, P., Gardner, B. P., & Blaikley, R. A. (2004). Athletic identity and sports participation in people with spinal cord injury. Adapted physical activity quarterly, 21(4), 364-378. [https://doi.org/10.1123/apaq.21.4.364]
  • Van der Ploeg, H. P., Streppel, K. R., van der Beek, A. J., van der Woude, L. H., van Harten, W. H., & van Mechelen, W. (2008). Underlying mechanisms of improving physical activity behavior after rehabilitation. International journal of behavioral medicine, 15, 101-108. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10705500801929684]
  • Van der Eecken, A., Spruyt, B., & Bradt, L.(2020). Parents’ role in adolescents’ leisure time use: From goals to parenting practices. Journal of Childhood, Education & Society, 1(1), 43-62. [https://doi.org/10.37291/2717638X.20201130]
  • Zeijl, E., Poel, Y. T., Bois-Reymond, M. D., Ravesloot, J., & Meulman, J. J. (2000). The role of parents and peers in the leisure activities of young adolescents. Journal of Leisure research, 32(3), 281-302. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2000.11949918]
  • 曹烃 & 刘珍.(2022).中国残疾人体育发展的现实困境与治理路径..(eds.)第十二届全国体育科学大会论文摘要汇编——专题报告（体育社会科学分会）（pp.397-399）.
  • 凌亢(2021). 中国残疾人事业发展报告（2021）. 社会科学文献出版社.
  • 凌亢(2023). 中国残疾人事业发展报告（2023）. 社会科学文献出版社.
  • 联合国(2006). 残疾人权利公约. 2015, 12, 24, http://www.un.org/chinese/disabilities/convention/convention.htm
  • 杨立雄 (2022). 残疾人体育参与的社会性障碍. 上海体育大学学报, 46(3), 1-11.