Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
Korean Society of Leisure, Recreation & Park
[ Article ]
Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park - Vol. 48, No. 3, pp.39-54
ISSN: 1598-0413 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Sep 2024
Received 31 Jul 2024 Revised 28 Aug 2024 Accepted 10 Sep 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26446/kjlrp.2024.6.48.3.39

갯벌 방문객의 경관 및 소리경관지각과 환경연결감 및 회복경험, 회복관련자기효능감, 재방문의도의 구조적 관계

홍빛나1 ; 김미연2 ; 송선미3 ; 오치옥4
1전남대학교
2한국콘텐츠진흥원
3전남대학교
4전남대학교
The Impacts of Landscape and Soundscape Perceptions of Tidal Flat Visitors on Their Recovery-related Self-Efficacy and Intention to Revisit through Nature Relatedness and Recovery Experience
Hong, Bit-Na1 ; Kim, Mi-Yeon2 ; Song, Seon-mi3 ; Oh, Chi-Ok4
1Chonnam National University
2Korea Creative Content Agency
3Chonnam National University
4Chonnam National University

Correspondence to: Yongbong-Ro 77, Yongji-Gwan 403, Gwangju, 61186, Oh, Chi-Ok E-mail: chiokoh@jnu.ac.kr

Abstract

This study intends to examine how tidal flat visitors' perceptions of landscape and soundscape affect their Recovery-related Self-Efficacy(RSE), and Revisit Intention(RI) through the concepts of Nature Relatedness(NR) and Recovery Experience(RE). The data were collected from 1,056 respondents, who had visited tidal flat areas at least once during the last 15 months. The findings are as follows: First, landscape perceptions are positively connected with NR, indicating that the visual perception of the tidal flat landscape enhances visitors' NR. Second, NR positively impacted RE, showing that visual stimuli in tidal flats play an important role on enhancing both NR and RE. Third, soundscape perception positively affected RE, suggesting that natural sounds in tidal flats enhance visitors' recovery experiences. Fourth, RE positively influenced RSE, indicating that positive experiences from visiting tidal flats increase individuals' RSE. Finally, RE positively affected RI, indicating that various recovery aspects of tidal flats play an important role in enhancing visitors' intention to revisit. These findings suggest that enhancing the visual and auditory elements of tidal flats can considerably improve visitors' recovery experiences and increase their likelihood of revisiting tidal flat areas. This highlights the importance of incorporating nature-relatedness and recovery experiences into the management and planning of tidal flat areas to promote visitor well-being and sustainable tourism.

Keywords:

landscape, soundscape, nature relatedness, recovery experience, recovery-related self-efficacy, revisit intention, tidal flats

키워드:

경관, 소리경관, 환경연결감, 회복경험, 회복관련자기효능감, 재방문의도, 갯벌

References

  • 국토해양부(2011). 동서남해안의 체계적인 경관관리 방안 마련을 위한 연구. 국토해양부.
  • 김근호, 장민숙(2018). 생태관광 재방문에 미치는 영향요인 -우포늪을 중심으로-. 한국도서연구, 30(3), 69-87.
  • 김미라(2020). 자연관광이 치유체험, 만족 및 재방문의도에 미치는 영향. 한국관광산업학회, 45(1), 59-79.
  • 김준(2017). 해양스포츠 참가자의 노블티와 회복 환경지각이 여가만족도와 스트레스 관련 성장에 미치는 영향. 한국체육교육학회지, 22(3), 81-94.
  • 김진옥(2018). 도시민의 지각된 스트레스가 자연기반 치유회복환경의 회복경험을 통해 건강관련 삶의 질에 미치는 영향-주의회복이론을 중심으로. 관광학연구, 42(7), 51-70.
  • 김진옥, 김남조, 한승훈(2016). 치유관광에서 자연을 통한 감정조절과 지각된 회복환경이 의사결정과정에 미치는 영향. 관광연구저널, 30(8), 47-60.
  • 문상정. (2020). 회복환경지각과 긍정적 정서, 심리적 행복감, 삶의 질의 구조적 관계-주의회복이론을 중심으로. Tourism Research, 45(1), 135-159.
  • 변병설(2000). 경관평가기법 개발에 관한 연구. 한국환경정책·평가연구원.
  • 우종필(2017). 우종필교수의 구조방정식모델 개념과 이해. 한나래.
  • 이승훈, 현명호(2003). 한국판 회복환경지각척도의 요인구조. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 8(2), 229-241.
  • 이재우, 김월호(2023). 섬 관광동기와 회복환경지각의 관계 - 주의회복이론을 중심으로-. 한국도서연구, 35(1), 19-39.
  • 이진의, 가정혜, 한승훈, 김남조(2015). 국립공원 탐방객의 회복환경지각이 가치, 만족 및 행동의도에 미치는 영향. 관광연구논총, 27(4), 95-116.
  • 이효정, 강재우, 조성희, 최정호(2023). 산림이용객의 방문 만족도, 재방문의도에 영향을 미치는 산림치유자원 및 산림치유효과 인식에 관한 연구. 한국산림휴양학회지, 27(4), 133-148.
  • 임승빈(2010). 경관분석론, 서울대 출판부.
  • 한국문화관광연구원(2022). 관광 트렌드 분석 및 전망 2023-2005.
  • 한주형, 최윤의, 김미주, 오치옥. (2020). 해양생태관광지로서 해수욕장 평가모델에 관한 연구. 관광레저연구, 32(3), 91-113.
  • 해양수산부(2021). 해양치유자원의 관리 및 활용에 관한 기본계획(2022~2026)
  • 해양환경정보보포털. (2024.08.30. 접속). 갯벌바로알기. http://www.meis.go.kr/mes/mudFlat/learn/view1.do
  • Alvarsson, J. J., Wiens, S., & Nilsson, M. E. (2010). Stress recovery during exposure to nature sound and environmental noise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7(3), 1036-1046. [https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7031036]
  • Chen, C. C., Petrick, J. F., & Shahvali, M. (2016). Tourism experiences as a stress reliever: Examining the effects of tourism recovery experiences on life satisfaction. Journal of Travel Research, 55(2), 150-160. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287514546223]
  • Chen, W. T., & Hsieh, M. H. (2023). Environmental self-identity, self-efficacy, and the emergence of green opinion leaders: An exploratory study. Heliyon, 9(6). [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17351]
  • Cheng, D., & Fountain, J. (2021). Mainland Chinese Generation Y tourists to Tibet: Travel constraints, revisit intention and their negotiation. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 48, 128-137. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.05.008]
  • Clark, N., & Janevic, M. R. (2014). Individual theories. Handbook of health behavior change, 3-26.
  • Emfield, A. G., & Neider, M. B. (2014). Evaluating visual and auditory contributions to the cognitive restoration effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 548. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00548]
  • Francomano, D., González, M. I. R., Valenzuela, A. E., Ma, Z., Rey, A. N. R., Anderson, C. B., & Pijanowski, B. C. (2022). Human-nature connection and soundscape perception: Insights from Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. Journal for Nature Conservation, 65, 126110. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2021.126110]
  • Frauke, B. (2018). Soundwalking. In The Routledge Companion to Sound Studies, 249-257. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315722191-28]
  • Guo, X., Liu, J., Albert, C., & Hong, X. C. (2022). Audio-visual interaction and visitor characteristics affect perceived soundscape restorativeness: Case study in five parks in China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 77, 127738. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127738]
  • Hahn, V. C., Binnewies, C., Sonnentag, S., & Mojza, E. J. (2011). Learning how to recover from job stress: effects of a recovery training program on recovery, recovery-related self-efficacy, and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(2), 202. [https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022169]
  • Hartig, T., Mang, M., & Evans, G. W. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23(1), 3-26. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916591231001]
  • Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Gärling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 109-123. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3]
  • He, M., Li, J., Li, J., & Chen, H. (2019). A comparative study on the effect of soundscape and landscape on tourism experience. International Journal of Tourism Research, 21(1), 11-22. [https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2237]
  • Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1989). The visual environment: Public participation in design and planning. Journal of Social Issues, 45(1), 59-86. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1989.tb01533.x]
  • Kimura T., Yamada T., Hirokawa Y., Shinohara K. (2021). Brief and indirect exposure to natural environment restores the directed attention for the task. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 619347. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.619347]
  • Korpela, K. M., Ylén, M., Tyrväinen, L., & Silvennoinen, H. (2008). Determinants of restorative experiences in everyday favorite places. Health & Place, 14(4), 636-652. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.008]
  • Maddock, J. E., Suess, C., Bratman, G. N., Smock, C., Kellstedt, D., Gustat, J., ... & Kaczynski, A. T. (2022). Development and validation of self-efficacy and intention measures for spending time in nature. BMC Psychology, 10(1), 51. [https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-022-00764-1]
  • Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 303-322. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9197-7]
  • Pálsdóttir, A. M., Persson, D., Persson, B., & Grahn, P. (2014). The journey of recovery and empowerment embraced by nature—clients’ perspectives on nature-based rehabilitation in relation to the role of the natural environment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(7), 7094-7115. [https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110707094]
  • Payne, S. R. (2013). The production of a perceived restorativeness soundscape scale. Applied Acoustics, 74(2), 255-263. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2011.11.005]
  • Sadowski, I., Böke, N., Mettler, J., Heath, N., & Khoury, B. (2022). Naturally mindful? The role of mindfulness facets in the relationship between nature relatedness and subjective well-being. Current Psychology 41(5), 1-16.
  • Schafer, R. M. (1975). ETA Hoffman and music. University of Toronto Press. [https://doi.org/10.3138/9781487583309]
  • Schultz, P. W. (2000). New environmental theories: Empathizing with nature: The effects ofPerspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 391-406. [https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00174]
  • Sonnentag, S., & Kruel, U. (2020). Psychological detachment from work during off-job time: The role of job stressors, job involvement, and recovery-related self-efficacy. Work and Rest: A Topic for Work and Organizational Psychology, Psychology Press, 197-217. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003059714-5]
  • Tang, I. C., Sullivan, W. C., & Chang, C. Y. (2015). Perceptual evaluation of natural landscapes: The role of the individual connection to nature. Environment and Behavior, 47(6), 595-617. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513520604]
  • Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201-230. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7]
  • Van den Berg, A. E., Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2007). Preference for nature in urbanized societies: Stress, restoration, and the pursuit of sustainability. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 79-96. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00497.x]
  • Velarde, M. D., Fry, G., & Tveit, M. (2007). Health effects of viewing landscapes–Landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4), 199-212. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.07.001]
  • Ye H., Zhu X. (2018). Study on the effect of spatial characteristics and health restoration of urban parks in Harbin city in autumn—taking Zhaolin park as an example. Journal of Human Settlements in West China, (4), 73-79.
  • Zhang, H., Wu, Y., & Buhalis, D. (2018). A model of perceived image, memorable tourism experiences and revisit intention. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 8, 326-336. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2017.06.004]
  • Zhang, J. W., Howell, R. T., & Iyer, R. (2014). Engagement with natural beauty moderates the positive relation between connectedness with nature and psychological well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 55-63. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.013]