Your browser does not support the PubReader view.
Go to this page to see a list of supporting browsers.
Korean Society of Leisure, Recreation & Park
[ Article ]
Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park - Vol. 48, No. 2, pp.151-162
ISSN: 1598-0413 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Jun 2024
Received 07 May 2024 Revised 03 Jun 2024 Accepted 18 Jun 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26446/kjlrp.2024.6.48.2.151

골프지도자의 일에서의 여가 경험 탐색

박영주1 ; 김미향2
1국민대학교 박사
2국민대학교 교수
An Exploratory Study on Golf Instructor’s Leisure Experienced at Work
Park, Yeong-Ju1 ; Kim, Mee-Hyang2
1Kookmin University
2Kookmin University

Correspondence to: Kim, Mee-Hyang E-mail: mhkim@kookmin.ac.kr

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the leisure experienced by golf instructors at work. Therefore, the situational factors experiencing leisure at work were explored, and the types of leisure experienced at work were suggested. For the study, a case study was conducted with 28 golf instructors, and data were collected through open-ended questionnaires through qualitative research methods. The results are as follows. First, Golf leaders were found to be experiencing leisure at work from various situations, such as experiencing pleasure and freedom from the physical environment, controlling the content and intensity of work on their own, and recognizing the desire for self-development for professionalism. Second, based on the results of the level of recognition of the concept of leisure experienced at work, it was found that the types of work-leisure experience were divided based on the physical condition ‘restraint’, and the psychological condition ‘voluntary’. Quadrant 1 is the ‘work-leisure identification type’ and belongs to the case where ‘restraint’ is low and ‘voluntary’ is high. Quadrant 2 is a ‘work-leisure harmony type’ and belongs to the case where high ‘restraint’ and ‘low voluntary’. Quadrant 3 is a ‘work-leisure opposition type’ and belongs to the case where high ‘restraint’ and low ‘voluntary’. Quadrant 4 is an area where both ‘restraint’ and ‘voluntary’ are low and does not correspond of the type of leisure experienced at work. This study is meaningful in that it provides new implications for understanding the boundaries between work and leisure according to professional characteristics by exploring the leisure experienced in the work of golf instructors, professional groups with a different work pattern from general workers.

Keywords:

work and leisure relationships, leisure experienced at work, work-leisure experience types, golf instructor

키워드:

일과 여가 관계, 일에서의 여가 경험, 일-여가 경험 유형, 골프지도자

Acknowledgments

본 연구는 박영주의 국민대학교 박사학위논문을 수정·보완하여 작성되었음.

References

  • 김동기, 김두한(2011). 골프지도자의 직업의식 체험에 관한 현상학적 분석. 코칭능력개발지, 13(4), 67-78.
  • 김주엽(2008). 직무특성과 일-가정 균형. 인적자원개발연구, 11(1), 109-132.
  • 김준석(2022). 골프연습장 지도자들의 직업의식에 따른 일 가치감 및 직무만족감의 관계. 한국스포츠학회지, 20(3), 301-308.
  • 김지선(2007). MOW(meaning of work)측정지표에 따른 일과 여가의 관계: 일지향형과 여가지향형을 중심으로. 미간행 석사학위논문, 한양대학교 대학원.
  • 김현식, 안준호(2018). 생활체육지도자의 지도신념과 수업지식 및 직업만족의 관계. 스포츠사이언스, 35(2), 81-88.
  • 노용구, 박원임(2000). 여가의 개념정립을 위한 연구. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 19, 91-103.
  • 서태양, 차석빈(1999). 여가론. 대왕사.
  • 설동준, 하선민, 송은영, 윤내리(2021). 하비프러너(Hobby-preneur) 사례를 통해 본 일-삶균형(WLB)의 의미 연구. 여가학연구, 19(4), 49-80.
  • 오세숙, 김종순, 이상돈(2014). 여성 생활체육지도자의 일과 삶에서의 몰입경험. 한국체육과학회지, 23(4), 197-205.
  • 유인영(2005). 농구지도자의 여가활동과 여가제약에 관한 탐색적 분석. 미간행 박사학위논문, 수원대학교 대학원.
  • 이남호(1995). 운동종목에 따른 생활체육지도자의 직업관과 근무환경에 관한 연구. 미간행석사학위논문, 건국대학교 교육대학원.
  • 임영삼, 박명국(2007). 골프지도자의 여가활동 및 여가제약. 한국여가레크리에이션학회, 31(3), 157-167.
  • 정용각(2000). 여가운동 참가자 성격의 Big-5 요인과 정서의 관계 분석. 한국체육학회지, 39(4), 265-275.
  • 조동기(2015). 중산층 고령자의 여가활동과 ‘통합적 노화’의 관계에 대한 탐색적 연구. 사회연구, 28, 45-68.
  • 최상진, 김기범, 최정인(2003). 한국문화에서의 여가의 의미. 여가학연구, 1(2), 33-42.
  • 통계청(2021.12.). 2021 국민여가활동조사. 문화체육관광부.
  • Ateca-Amestory, V., Serrano-del-Rosal, R., & Vera-Toscano, E.(2008). The leisure experience. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(1), 64-78. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2006.12.025]
  • Berg, J. M., Grant, A. M., & Johnson, V.(2010). When callings are calling: Crafting work and leisure in pursuit of unanswered occupational callings. Organization Science, 21(5), 973-994. [https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0497]
  • Bulger, C. A., Matthews, R. A., & Hoffman, M. E.(2007). Work and personal life boundary management: Boundary strength, work/personal life balance, and the segmentation-integration continuum. Journal of occupational health psychology, 12(4), 365. [https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.4.365]
  • Cobb, H. R., Murphy, L. D., Thomas, C. L., Katz, I. M., & Rudolph, C. W.(2022). Measuring boundaries and borders: A taxonomy of work-nonwork boundary management scales. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 137, 103760. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103760]
  • Creswell, J. W., Shope, R., Plano Clark, V. L., & Green, D. O.(2006). How interpretive qualitative research extends mixed methods research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 1-11.
  • Florida, R.(2014). The creative class and economic development. Economic development quarterly, 28(3), 196-205. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242414541693]
  • Guerrier, Y., & Adib, A.(2003). Work at leisure and leisure at work: A study of the emotional labor of tour reps. Human Relations, 56(11), 1399-1418. [https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267035611006]
  • Gunter, B. G., & Gunter, N. C.(1980). Leisure styles: A conceptual framework for modern leisure. Sociological Quarterly, 21(3), 361-374. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1980.tb00618.x]
  • Hargreaves, D. H.(2017). Interpersonal relations and education. Routledge. [https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315228990]
  • Hill, E. J.(2005). Work-family facilitation and conflict, working fathers and mothers, work-family stressors and support. Journal of Family issues, 26(6), 793-819. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X05277542]
  • Kelly, J. R.(2009). Work and leisure: A simplified paradigm. Journal of Leisure Research, 41(3), 439-451. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2009.11950183]
  • Kossek, E. E., Thompson, R. J., & Lautsch, B. A. (2020). "Balanced Workplace Flexibility: Avoiding the Traps." California Management Review, 61(1), 5-25. [https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.4.5]
  • Liang, Y. W.(2018). Conceptualization and measurement of work–leisure facilitation. Journal of Leisure Research, 49(2), 109-132. [https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2018.1489194]
  • Nash, J., & Churchill, E.(2021). "Workcations and Hybrid Work: The New Normal?" Journal of Business Research, 123, 288-295.
  • Neulinger, J.(1981). To leisure: An introduction. To leisure: an introduction.
  • Parker, Stanley(1983). Leisure and Work. London:Allen and Unwin.
  • Primeau, L. A.(1995). Orchestration of work and play within families. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, LA.
  • Primeau, L. A.(1996). Work and leisure: Transcending the dichotomy. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50(7), 569-577. [https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.50.7.569]
  • Samdahl, D. M.(1988). A symbolic interactionist model of leisure: Theory and empirical support. Leisure Sciences, 10, 27-39. [https://doi.org/10.1080/01490408809512174]
  • Sonnentag, S.(2023). "How to combine work and leisure for better well-being." Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 28(2), 159-173.
  • Wilensky, H. L.(1960). Work, Careers and Social Integration. International Social Science Journal, 12(4), 543-560.