Korean Society of Leisure, Recreation & Park

Journal Archive

Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park - Vol. 45 , No. 3

[ Article ]
Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park - Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 169-186
Abbreviation: KSLRP
ISSN: 1598-0413 (Print)
Print publication date 30 Sep 2021
Received 02 Aug 2021 Revised 01 Sep 2021 Accepted 17 Sep 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26446/kjlrp.2021.9.45.3.169

코로나19로 인한 테니스장 폐쇄가 교수테니스 동호인들의 삶에 주는 의미
박세혁1
1서울과학기술대학교 교수

The Meaning of Shut-down of Tennis Courts for the Members’ Life of a Faculty Tennis Club during Covid-19 Crisis
Park, Se-Hyuk1
1Seoul National University of Science & Technology
Correspondence to : Park, Se-Hyuk E-mail: parkse@seoultech.ac.kr


Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic is having an unprecedented impact upon human-beings’ daily lives. The primary purpose of this study was to identify individual experiences due to the shut-down of a tennis club court during the Covid-19 pandemic, with which tennis club members faced. This study also attempted to identify challenges and constraints in performing active leisure activities during the Covid-19 pandemic within the frameworks of leisure constraints negotiation. Using constructivist grounded theory, 18 participants took part in this study. The findings indicated seven main themes: (a) reduction of close human relationships, (b) increase of excessive stress, (c) reduction of flow in performing job-related tasks, (d) reduction of pleasure in daily lives, (e) increase of physical problem, (f) increase of sedentary leisure activities, and (g) reduction of leisure satisfaction. It appeared that these negative life changes derived from the shut-down of a tennis club court can be ameliorated and modified depending upon each individual's leisure constraints negotiation and repertoire of serious leisure, which are associated with his/her leisure satisfaction and perceived health in the Covid-19 crisis. Theoretical and practical implications are also discussed.


Keywords: Covid-19, leisure constraints, leisure constraints negotiation, serious leisure
키워드: 코로나19, 여가제약, 여가제약협상, 진지한여가

References
1. 고광욱 (2020). 코로나 19 사회적 거리두기 신체활동수칙. 보건교육건강증진학회지, 37(1), 109-112.
2. 김남희, 최윤의, 오치옥 (2019). 야외 여가활동에서의 지속적 참여의도와 여가제약과 협상, 협상효능감, 여가정체성의 순환 관계 검증: 자전거 라이딩 참여자를 대상으로. 여가학연구, 17(4), 57-76.
3. 김보영 (2021). 코로나19의 시대, 사회서비스의 정책적 과제와 비전에 대한 탐색. 비판사회정책, 70, 43-71.
4. 김영신, 김광환, 이무식 (2020). 인터넷 사용 영향에 따른 청소년의 건강행태 분석. 한국산학기술학회논문집, 21(6), 603-610.
5. 김영준 (2014). 골프 참여자의 레크리에이션 전문화가 여가제약협상에 미치는 영향. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 38(2), 17-28.
6. 김재운, 김한범, 임새미, 박찬우 (2018). 테니스 동호회 활동에서의 여가문화 탐구. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 42(4), 67-82.
7. 김현지 (2012). 테니스 동호회 활동을 통한 사회관계 형성에 관한 현상학적 분석. 한국레저사이언스학회지, 3(1), 13-20.
8. 남을순 (2018). 자원봉사자의 여가비용이 여가제약 협상에 미치는 영향. 여가관광연구, 30, 1-19.
9. 박광호, 이승연, 김진원 (2020). 대학생들의 COVID-19 전후 여가변화와 여가동기 및 건강신념과의 관계. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 44(3), 69-86.
10. 박상기(2018). 노인의 여가몰입이 생활만족도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 사회적지지의 조절효과 검증. 사회복지경영연구, 5(2), 361-378.
11. 박석, 정석현, 김태영 (2006). 휠체어 테니스 운동이 의전차 추진 척수손상 장애인의 손 근력에 미치는 영향. 한국체육과학회지, 15(4), 859-868.
12. 박세혁 (2020). 행복을 탐구하는 여가 및 레크리에이션 플러스. 서울: 대한미디어.
13. 박세혁 (2008). 테니스 참가자들의 여가만족, 충성도, 생활만족의 관계분석. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 32(2), 13-20.
14. 박세혁, 김선정, 한아름 (2015). 국가대표 장애인 선수들의 진지한여가, 생활만족, 행복감의 관계. 한국체육학회지, 54(5), 569-580.
15. 사혜지, 이원상, 이봉규 (2021). 코로나 블루와 여가 활동 : 한국 사례를 중심으로. 인터넷정보학회논문지, 22(2) 109-121.
16. 송화성, 이영안, 강영애 (2020). 결혼이주여성의 여가제약협상 유형과 특성: 잠재프로파일 분석(Latent Profile Analysis)을 이용하여. 관광연구, 35(3), 1-23.
17. 윤지인, 한진욱, 이지원 (2021). 야외 여가활동 참여자의 코로나 관련 위험인지, 스트레스 수준 및 대처행동의 관계. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 45(1), 89-101.
18. 이민석, 김민정, 이철원 (2020). 테니스 참여 액티브시니어의 여가태도와 삶의 질의 관계 분석: 스트레스 관련 성장의 매개 효과를 중심으로. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 44(2), 17-29.
19. 이원희, 정연성, 공성배, 김원경 (2009). 테니스 동호인의 참여동기와 몰입경험이 생활만족에 미치는 영향. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 33(1), 17~27.
20. 정대조, 이민석, 이철원 (2020). 액티브 시니어 테니스 참여자의 여가열정, 건강관심도 및 생활만족의 관계 분석. 한국체육과학회지, 29(4), 87-98.
21. 조희태, 우효동, 황선환 (2016). 테니스 참여자의 여가이탈과 이탈이후 삶의 변화. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 40(2), 73-86.
22. 주진영, 이세경, 원형중 (2021). COVID-19(코로나) 발생 전후로 나타난 청년의 여가활동유형과 우울감 관계. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 45(2), 87-99.
23. 최현욱, 이민석 (2019). 여가동아리 참여 대학생의 여가만족, 스트레스 관련 성장 및 삶의 질의 구조적 관계. 한국체육학회지, 58(1), 203-215.
24. 하제연, 김준 (2014). 여가스포츠 참가자의 참가정도에 따른 진지한 여가, 행복감, 생활만족도 차이. 한국사회체육학회, 57, 565-577.
25. 한국이미지커뮤니케이션연구원 (2021. 01.14). 코로나 여파 속 여가활동 1위는? 스포츠경향. Retrived from March, 20, 2021, http://sports.khan.co.kr/entertainment/sk_index.html?art_id=202101141851003&sec_id=540201
26. 한원형, 고영찬, 김석훈, 김영표 (2015). 테니스 운동이 중년 비만여성의 체력 및 신체구성에 미치는 영향. 체육과학연구, 21, 57-65.
27. 홍종관 (2017). 행복을 위한 몰입의 역할에 대한 연구. 행복한 부자연구, 6, 37-51.
28. Bond, A. J., Widdop, P., Cockayne, D., & Parnell, D. (2020). Prosumption, networks and value during a global pandemic: Lockdown leisure and COVID-19. Leisure Sciences.
29. Casper, J. (2007). Sport commitment, participation frequency and purchase intention segmentation based on age, gender, income and skill level with US tennis participants. European Sport Management Quarterly, 7(3), 269-282.
30. Chang, H. H. (2016). Gender differences in leisure involvement and flow experience in professional extreme sport activities. World Leisure Journal.
31. Chen, C. (2019). A cross-country study of leisure constraints and option framing effect in Chinese and Taiwanese package tour market. Asia Pacific Management Review, 24, 223-231.
32. Coleman, D., & Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1993). Leisure and health: The role of social support and self-determination. Journal of Leisure Research, 25, 111-128.
33. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angles: Sage.
34. Csikzentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.
35. Du, J., Floyd, C., Kim, A. C. H., Baker, B. J., Sato, M., James, J. D., & Funk, D. C. (2020). To be or not to be: negotiating leisure constraints with technology and data analytics amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Leisure Studies.
36. Dupuis, S. L., & Smale, B. J. (1995). An examination of relationship between psychological well-being and depression and leisure activity participation among older adults. Loisir et Societe / Society and Leisure, 18(1), 67-92.
37. Huang, H., Lai, J., & Huang, T. (2019). Mediating effects of depression on anxiety and leisure constraints in patients with breast cancer. BMC Women's Health, 19.
38. Isham, A., Gatersleben, B., & Jackson, T. (2019). Flow activities as a route to living well with less. Environment and Behavior, 51, 431-461.
39. Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1986). A theory of substitutability of leisure behavior. Leisure Sciences, 8, 367-389.
40. Iso-Ahola, S. E., & Weissinger, E. (1987). Leisure and boredom. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 5(3), 35 6-364.
41. Iwasaki, Y. (2017). Leisure and meaning-making: Implications for rehabilitation to engage persons with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 46, 225-232.
42. Jackson, E. L. (1993). Recognizing patterns of leisure constraints: Results from alternative analyses. Journal of Leisure Research, 25(2), 129-149.
43. Jackson, E. L., Crawford, D., & Godbey, G. (1993). Negotiation of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 15, 1-11.
44. Jeong, S., Choi, D., & Ahn, H. (2020). Narrative study on the serious leisure participation process of the participants in the futsal group of living sports. The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 59(2), 45-57.
45. Jung, J. H., Yoo, B. Y., Won, K. J., & Park, S. H. (2016). Examining the effects of involvement profiles and specialization on loyalty to a respective tennis club. International Journal of Human Movement Science, 10(2), 67-82.
46. Jung, S., Park, J., Park, D., Sohn, C., Lee, J., & Kim, T. (2018). Physical inactivity and unhealthy metabolic status are associated with decreased natural killer cell activity. Yonsei Medical Journal, 59(4), 554-562.
47. Kim, C. W., Kim, H. B., Lim, S. M., & Park, C. W. (2018). Research on leisure culture through tennis club activities. Journal of Leisure and Recreation Studies, 42(4), 67-82.
48. Kim, J., Kim, M., Henderson, K., Han, A., & Park, S. H. (2016). Serious engagement in sport and health benefits among Korean immigrants in the USA. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being. 11, 31340-
49. Kim, U., & Yoon, M., (2019). Relationship among physical activity levels, disability acceptance, and life satisfaction of people with physical disabilities. International Journal of Human Movement Science, 13(3), 105-114.
50. Lee, M. S., Lee, M. J., & Lee, C. W. (2020). An analysis of the relationship between leisure attitude and quality of life of active seniors participating in tennis: Focusing on the mediating effect of stress-related growth. Journal of Leisure and Recreation Studies, 44(2), 17-29.
51. Lee, S., Chung, J. E., & Park, N. (2016). Linking cultural capital with subjective well-being and social support: The role of communication networks. Social Science Computer Review, 34, 172-196.
52. Lefevre, J. (1988). Flow and the quality of experience during work and leisure. In M. Csikszentmihalyi & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 307-318). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
53. McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54. Mueller, T., Landon, A. C., & Graefe, A. R. (2019) Modeling the role of social identity in constraint negotiation for ultra-endurance gravel cycling. Journal of Leisure Research, 50, 81-106.
55. Park, S. H., & Kim, Y. S. (2018). Ways of coping with excessive academic stress among Korean adolescents during leisure time. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being. 13(1).
56. Papaioannou, A. G., Schinke, R. J., Chang, Y. K., Kim, Y. H., & Duda, J. L. (2020). Physical activity, health and well-being in an imposed social distanced world. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18, 414-419.
57. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58. Raymore, L., Godbey, G., & Crawford, D. W.(1994). Self-esteem, gender and socioeconomic status: Their relation to perception of constraint on leisure among adolescents. Journal of Leisure Research, 26(2), 99-118.
59. Stebbins, R. A. (1992). Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure. Montreal: McGrill Queen’s University Press.
60. Stebbins, R. A. (2018). Social world and the leisure experience. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Limited.
61. Trzebinski, J., Cabanski, M., & Czarnecka, J. Z. (2020). Reaction to the COVID- 19 pandemic: The influence of mean ing in life, life satisfaction, and assumptions on world orderliness an d positivity. Journal of Loss and Trauma.
62. Wang, L. (2017). Using the self-determination theory to understand Chinese adolescent leisure-time physical activity. European Journal of Sport Science, 17, 453–461.
63. Weiss, M. R., Kimmel, L. A., & Smith, A. L. (2001). Determinants of sport commitment among junior tennis players: Enjoyment as a mediating variables. Pediatric Exercise Science, 13, 131-144.
64. Wen, J., Huang, S., & Goh, E. (2020). Effects of perceived constraints and negotiation on learned helplessness: A study of Chinese senior outbound tourists. Tourism Management.
65. White, D. D. (2008). A structural model of leisure constraints negotiation in outdoor recreation. Leisure Sciences, 30, 342–59.
66. Yamada, M., Kimura, Y., Ishiyama, D., Otobe, Y., Suzuki, M., Koyama, S., Kikuchi, T., Kusumi, H., & Arai, H. (2020). Effect of the COVID-19 epidemic on physical activity in community-dwelling older adults in Japan: A cross-sectional online survey. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, 24, 948-950.