Korean Society of Leisure, Recreation & Park

Current Issue

Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park - Vol. 48 , No. 1

[ Article ]
Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park - Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 31-42
Abbreviation: KSLRP
ISSN: 1598-0413 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Mar 2024
Received 29 Jan 2024 Revised 06 Mar 2024 Accepted 18 Mar 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26446/kjlrp.2024.3.48.1.31

The moderating effect of health inequality in the relationship between income and relative leisure deprivation among baby boomers
Lee, Yu-Jin1, ; Hwang, Hyang-Hee2 ; Kim, Bo-Ram3
1University of Seoul
2Kangwon National University
3Jeonju Kijeon College

베이비붐세대의 소득과 상대적 여가박탈감의 관계에서 건강불평등의 조절효과
이유진1, ; 황향희2 ; 김보람3
1서울시립대학교 스포츠과학과 연구교수
2강원대학교 스포츠과학과 교수
3전주기전대학 운동재활과 교수
Correspondence to : Kim, Bo-Ram E-mail: brh@naver.com

Funding Information ▼

Abstract

The intention of this study was to contribute basic data for establishing a welfare system in Korea that can minimize social problems caused by income disparity, specifically health inequality and perceptions of deprivation of leisure opportunities. To this end, a total of 512 study participants recruited through an online research company completed a 28-item question consisting of demographic variables as well as income, health inequality, and RLD; the survey took place during the month of October 2021. For data processing, frequency analysis and descriptive statistical analysis were performed using SPSS 27.0 and AMOS 25.0, and confirmatory factor analysis, reliability analysis, correlation analysis, and Model 1 of Process Macro 3.4 were used as well. The conclusions drawn from this are as follows. First, income had a negative effect on RLD such that higher incomes were associated with less sense of leisure deprivation, and the opposite was true for lower incomes. Second, health inequality moderated the relationship between income and RLD. Relative leisure deprivation decreased as income increased in the middle and high health inequality groups, but income had no effect in the group with low health inequality. Therefore, attention at the national level is required to improve both income and health disparities among the less fortunate in Korea, which will in turn improve the sense of relative leisure deprivation. Governments need to bridge the relative lack of leisure by establishing institutions that can more evenly distribute resources and health-related benefits to the underprivileged, and by supporting better incomes and leisure opportunities.


Keywords: baby boomers, income, health inequality, relative leisure deprivation, welfare
키워드: 베이비붐세대, 소득, 건강 불평등, 상대적 여가박탈감, 복지

Acknowledgments

이 논문은 2018년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2018S1A5A2A01036361).


References
1. Adler, N. E., Boyce, T., Chesney, M. A., Cohen, S., Folkman, S., Kahn, R. L., & Syme, S. L. (1994). Socioeconomic status and health: the challenge of the gradient. American psychologist, 49(1), 15.
2. Berkman, L., & Kawach, I. (Eds.) (2000). Social Epidemiology. Oxford University Press.
3. Choi, J. H., & Kim, D. J. (2018). Perception of Health Inequalities in Korea and Its Implications. Health and welfare policy forum, 2018(1), 76-87.
4. Cho, M. R. (2016). Leisure Inequality in Korea 1999~2009: The Trends and Cause of Leisure Time Inequality among Gender. Korea Journal of Population Studies, 39(1), 29-57.
5. Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological review, 83(2), 85.
6. Davidson, R., Kitzinger, J., & Hunt, K. (2006). The wealthy get healthy, the poor get pooly? Lay perception of health inequalities. Soc Sci and Med, 62, 2171-2182.
7. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-14.
8. Green, E. C. (1992). Sexually transmitted disease, ethnomedicine and health policy in Africa. Social Science & Medicine, 35(2), 121-130.
9. Han, C., Janmant, J. G., Hokins, B., & Green, A. (2012). Perception of Inequalities: Implication for social cohesion. Centre for Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge and Societies (LLAKES). Institute of Education, University of London.
10. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, And Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach(2ed). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
11. Hwang, H. H. (2017). The Impacts of Leisure Lifestyle and Sense of Generativity of Baby Boomers in Large Cities. Journal of Leisure Studies, 15(2), 81-100.
12. Hwang, H. H., & Kim, B. R. (2020). Conceptualization of Relative Leisure Deprivation. Journal of leisure and recreation studies, 15(2), 81-100.
13. Hwang, H. H, Lee, Y. J., & Kim, B. R. (2021). Development of the Relative Leisure Deprivation Scale and Verification of the Validity. Korean journal of physical education, 60(3), 103-114.
14. Hwang, H. H., Lee, Y. J., & Kim, B. R. (2021). Effects of Relative Leisure Deprivation between Regions on Life Satisfaction in Koreans: Focusing on Baby Boomers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24), 12905.
15. Jang, Y. M., & Kang, Y. H. (2015). Work Satisfaction and Quality of Life in Baby Boomer: Focused on Retirement Preparation as Mediator Effect. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 16(2), 1084-1091.
16. Kim, B. R., Kim, M., & Yoon, S. Y. (2020). Research on Gender Difference in Seniors’ Happiness using 2018 National Survey on Participation Sports. Korean journal of physical education, 59(1), 253-266.
17. Kim, B. R., & Kim, M. (2021). Determinants of baby boomers' leisure satisfaction and happiness. Journal of Leisure Studies, 19(3), 71-91.
18. Kim, D. J. (2016). Health equity monitoring and business development to improve the health level of the people. Report of Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, 21-548.
19. Kim, D. J. (2018). Health equity monitoring and business development to raise the health standards of the people: Health inequality as seen by statistics. Korea Institute of Health and Social Research.
20. Kondo, N., Kawachi, I., Hirai, H., Kondo, K., Subramanian, S. V., Hanibuchi, T., & Yamagata, Z. (2009). Relative deprivation and incident functional disability among older Japanese women and men: prospective cohort study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 63(6), 461-467.
21. Kwak, J.H., & Hong, K.W.(2017). Leisure inequality on income: The relationship of leisure time·cost and happiness. Int. J. Tour. Manag. Sci. 32, 293–309.
22. Kwon, J. O., Lee, E. N., & Bae, S. H. (2015). Concept analysis of health inequalities. Journal of Korean academy of nursing administration, 21(1), 20-31.
23. Marmot, M. (2002). The influence of income on health: views of an epidemiologist. Health affairs, 21(2), 31-46.
24. McEwen, B. S., & Seeman, T. (1999). Protective and damaging effects of mediators of stress: elaborating and testing the concepts of allostasis and allostatic load. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 896(1), 30-47.
25. Min, W. K. (2002). A study on the present condition solution plan of leisure - inequality in Korea. Journal of leisure and recreation studies, 22, 111-126.
26. Na, J. K. (2021). Cultural psychological perspectives on social class, ineqaulity and relative deprivation. 2021 Annual Conference of Korean Psychological Association, 8, 69-69.
27. Shin, K. Y. (2016). Inequality and Opportunity Inequality in Korea. The Korean Sociological Association, 6, 125-141.
28. Subramanyam, M., Kawachi, I., Berkman, L., & Subramanian, S. V. (2009). Relative deprivation in income and self-rated health in the United States. Social science & medicine, 69(3), 327-334.
29. Subramanian, S. V., Belli, P., & Kawachi, I. (2002). The macroeconomic determinants of health. Annual review of public health, 23(1), 287-302.
30. Subramanian, S. V., & Kawachi, I. (2006). Whose health is affected by income inequality? A multilevel interaction analysis of contemporaneous and lagged effects of state income inequality on individual self-rated health in the United States. Health & place, 12(2), 141-156.
31. Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom: a survey of household resources and standards of living. Univ of California Press.
32. Walker, I., & Pettigrew, T. F. (1984). “Relative deprivation theory: An overview and conceptual critique.” British Journal of Social Psychology, 23(4), 301-310.
33. Walker, I., & Smith, H. J. (Eds.) (2002). Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration. Cambridge University Press.
34. Whelan, C. T., Layte, R., & Maître, B. (2004). Understanding the mismatch between income poverty and deprivation: a dynamic comparative analysis. European Sociological Review, 20(4), 287-302.
35. Wilkinson, R. (1996). Unhealthy societies: the afflictions of inequality. London: Routledge.
36. Wilkinson, R. G. (1997). Socioeconomic determinants of health: Health inequalities: relative or absolute material standards? Bmj, 314(7080), 591.
37. Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2006). Income inequality and population health: a review and explanation of the evidence. Social science & medicine, 62(7), 1768-1784.
38. World Health Organization(2009). The 62nd World Health Assembly. Reducing health inequalities through action on the social determinants of health. Geneva: World Health Organization
39. Yngwe, M. Å., Fritzell, J., Burström, B., & Lundberg, O. (2005). Comparison or consumption? Distinguishing between different effects of income on health in Nordic welfare states. Social science & medicine, 61(3), 627-635.