Korean Society of Leisure, Recreation & Park

Current Issue

Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park - Vol. 48 , No. 1

[ Article ]
Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park - Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 1-16
Abbreviation: KSLRP
ISSN: 1598-0413 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Mar 2024
Received 09 Jan 2024 Revised 06 Mar 2024 Accepted 18 Mar 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26446/kjlrp.2024.3.48.1.1

An Exploration of Viewers’ Perceptions and Experiences at Action Sports Events in the Hangzhou 2022 Asian Game
Lee, Eun-su1
1Loughborough University

항저우 2022 아시안게임 액션 스포츠 종목 시청자 인식 및 경험 탐색: 스케이트보딩 및 브레이킹 중심으로
이은수1
1러프버러대학교 박사과정
Correspondence to : Lee, Eun-su E-mail: e.lee@lboro.ac.uk


Abstract

Activities traditionally considered leisure pursuits, such as breaking and skateboarding, have been reclassified as action sports and incorporated into prominent international sports competitions, including the Olympics and the Asian Games. This study aims to explore public perceptions and experiences concerning the inclusion of these action sports at the Hangzhou 2022 Asian Games. Employing a hybrid methodological approach, the study analysed responses from an 182 online survey comprising closed and open-ended questions. Drawing upon quantitative and qualitative analyses, three key findings are presented. Firstly, a significant portion of the survey participants viewed the addition of new action sports, such as breaking and skateboarding, to international sports events favourably. Secondly, whilst most recognised these activities as legitimate sports, a minority perceived them otherwise. Thirdly, the acceptance of these activities as sports was widespread, yet concerns were raised regarding the transparency and precision of the judging and scoring systems. This article underscores the evolving nature of global sports consumption and advocates for a broader, more inclusive definition of sports. It also emphasises the necessity of establishing clear, transparent evaluation criteria for new action sports to bolster their legitimacy and foster broader acceptance.


Keywords: Action sports, breaking, skateboarding, the Olympics, the Asian Games
키워드: 액션스포츠, 브레이킹, 스케이트보딩, 올림픽, 아시안게임

References
1. Alhojailan, M. I., & Ibrahim, M. (2012). Thematic Analysis : A Critical Review of Its Process and Evaluation. WEI International European Academic Conference Proceedings, 1(2011), 8–21.
2. Booth, D., & Thorpe, H. (2007). Berkshire encyclopedia of extreme sports. (No Title).
3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
4. Coates, E., Clayton, B., & Humberstone, B. (2010). A battle for control: Exchanges of power in the subculture of snowboarding. Sport in Society, 13(7), 1082–1101.
5. Collins, L., & Brymer, E. (2020). Understanding nature sports: A participant centred perspective and its implications for the design and facilitating of learning and performance. Annals of Leisure Research, 23(1), 110-125.
6. Ellmer, E. M. M., & Rynne, S. B. (2019). Professionalisation of action sports in Australia. Sport in Society, 22(10), 1742 –1757.
7. ESPN PRESS ROOM. (2021, July 26). X games summer competition returns in 2021 to multiplatform success and significant growth. ESPN Press Room. Retrieved from https://espnpressroom.com/us/press-releases/2021/07/x-games-summer-competition-returns-in-2021-to-multiplatform-success-and-significantgrowth/
8. Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International journal of qualitative methods, 5(1), 80-92.
9. Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological bulletin, 51(4), 327.
10. Heere, Bob. “Embracing the Sportification of Society: Defining e-Sports through a Polymorphic View on Sport.” Sport Management Review 21, no. 1 (2018): 21–24.
11. Hao, N., Ruan, S., Song, Y., Chen, J., & Tian, L. (2023). The Establishment of a precise intelligent evaluation system for sports events: Diving. Heliyon, 9(11).
12. Humphreys, D. (2003). Selling out snowboarding: The alternative response to commercial co-optation. To the extreme: Alternative sports, inside and out, 407-428.
13. International Olympic Committee (n.d.). skateboarding. Retrieved from https://olympics.com/en/sports/skateboarding/
14. International Olympic Committee (n.d.). breaking. Retrieved from https://olympics.com/en/sports/breaking/
15. Kim, K., Sung, H., Noh, Y., & Lee, K. (2021). Broadcaster Choice and Audience Demand for Live Sport Games: Panel Analyses of the Korea Baseball Organization. Journal of Sport Management, 36(5), 488-499.
16. King, K., & Church, A. (2015). Questioning policy, youth participation and lifestyle sports. Leisure studies, 34(3), 282-302.
17. Li, R. Z., & Vexler, Y. A. (2019). Breaking for Gold: Another Crossroads in the Divergent History of this Dance. International Journal of the History of Sport, 36(4–5), 430–448.
18. Naderifar, M., Goli, H., & Ghaljaie, F. (2017). Snowball sampling: A purposeful method of sampling in qualitative research. Strides in development of medical education, 14(3).
19. Ojala, A. L. (2014). Institutionalisation in professional freestyle snowboarding– Finnish professional riders’ perceptions. European Journal for Sport and Society, 11(2), 103–126.
20. Olken, F., & Rotem, D. (1986). Simple random sampling from relational databases.
21. Park H., Yoo, H, & Lim, D. (2021). The Controversy over Breakdancing Becoming an Olympic Sport. Journal of Education & Culture, 27(2), 509-535.
22. Park, S. (2020). Is eSport ‘Real’ Sport?. Korean Journal of Physical Education, 59(3), 47-58.
23. Renfree, G., Cueson, D., Wood, C., Cueson, D., & Wood, C. (2021). Managing Sport and Leisure Skateboard , BMX freestyle, and sport climbing communities’ responses to their sports ’ inclusion in the Olympic Games responses to their sports ’ inclusion in the Olympic Games. Managing Sport and Leisure, 0(0), 1–15.
24. Rinehart, R. (2000). Emerging/arriving sport: Alternatives to formal sports. Handbook of sports studies, 504-519.
25. Sterchele, D., & Ferrero Camoletto, R. (2017). Governing bodies or managing freedom? Subcultural struggles, national sport systems and the glocalised institutionalis ation of parkour. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 9(1), 89-105.
26. Sterchele, D., & Ferrero Camoletto, R. (2017). Governing bodies or managing freedom? Subcultural struggles, national sport systems and the glocalised institutionalis ation of parkour. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 9(1), 89-105.
27. Thorpe, H., & Wheaton, B. (2011). “generation x games”, action sports and the olympic movement: Understanding the cultural politics of incorporation. Sociology, 45(5), 830–847.
28. Thorpe, H. (2008). Extreme sports in China. China gold: China’s quest for global power and Olympic glory, 10-11.
29. Turner, D. (2013). The civilized skateboarder and the sports funding hegemony: a case study of alternative sport. Sport in Society (Vol. 16, Issue 10, pp. 1248–1262). Taylor & Francis.
30. Vincent, S., & O'Mahoney, J. (2018). Critical realism and qualitative research: An introductory overview. The Sage handbook of qualitative business and management research methods.
31. Wheaton, B. (2004). Introduction: Mapping the lifestyle sport-scape. In Understanding lifestyle sport (pp. 13-40). Routledge.
32. Wheaton, B., & Thorpe, H. (2018). Action sports, the Olympic Games, and the opportunities and challenges for gender equity: The cases of surfing and skateboarding. Journal of sport and social issues, 42(5), 315-342.
33. Wheaton, B., & Thorpe, H. (2019). Action sport media consumption trends across generations: Exploring the Olympic audience and the impact of action sports inclusion. Communication & Sport, 7(4), 415-445.
34. Kim, M, Jin, J. K., & Koo, H. (2009). Influence of Leisure Motivation on the Negotiation of Leisure Constraints and Leisure Sports Participation. Journal of Leisure and Recreation Studies, 33(3), 153-162.