Korean Society of Leisure, Recreation & Park

Current Issue

Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park - Vol. 48 , No. 1
[Paper List]

[ Article ]
Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park - Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 13-27
Abbreviation: KSLRP
ISSN: 1598-0413 (Print)
Print publication date 31 Dec 2022
Received 31 Oct 2022 Revised 17 Dec 2022 Accepted 26 Dec 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26446/kjlrp.2022.12.46.4.13

진지한 여가 비용에 대한 잠재프로파일분석(LPA) 및 영향요인 검증
김태환1 ; 황선환2
1서울시립대학교 박사과정
2서울시립대학교 교수

Latent Profile Analysis of Serious Leisure Cost and Validation of Factors Affecting
Kim, Taehwan1 ; Hwang, Sunhwan2
1University of Seoul
2University of Seoul
Correspondence to : Hwang, Sunhwan E-mail: shhwang@uos.ac.kr

Funding Information ▼
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of serious leisure cost on participants' satisfaction by examining the difference in intention of continuous participation among subgroups. In order to achieve the purpose of this study, adults who are seriously participating in leisure sports activities in the metropolitan area were set as the population, and data were collected using the purposive sampling method. Confirmatory factor analysis, reliability analysis, descriptive statistical analysis and correlation analysis were performed using SPSS 26.0 and AMOS 26.0 program. As the main analyzing method, latent profile analysis using the Mplus 7.0 program was performed, multinomial logistic regression analysis and One-way ANOVA were performed. As a result of a latent profile analysis with the sub-factor of serious leisure cost as an index, it was most appropriate to classify the latent profiles into three categories. The three classified groups were named as low-cost group, medium-cost group, and high-cost group, respectively. As a result of multinomial logistic regression analysis to predict the characteristics of the three groups classified through the latent profile analysis, the durable benefits and strong identity among serious leisure distinct, and gender were derived as factors affecting. Finally, one-way ANOVA was performed to verify the difference in intention of continuous participation between the three groups classified. Low-cost group showed higher intention to continue than the other groups.

Keywords: serious leisure, serious leisure benefits, serious leisure costs, latent profile analysis, intention to continue
키워드: 진지한 여가, 진지한 여가 편익, 진지한 여가 비용, 잠재프로파일분석, 지속의도
Acknowledgments

이 논문 또는 저서는 2022년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2022S1A5B5A17044416)

References
1. 강희엽, 이철원, 김형훈(2015). 축구 참여 여대생의 진지한 여가, 신체적 자기개념 및 자아성취감의 관계. 여가학연구, 13(4), 39-56.
2. 김미량(2015). 진지한여가 척도의 재정립. 한국체육학회지, 54(2), 313-322.
3. 김영서, 홍세희(2021). 학교 밖 청소년의 여가시간 활용에 대한 잠재프로파일분석. 여가학연구, 19(1), 23-49.
4. 김태환, 황선환(2017). 진지한 여가 수준에 따른 진지한 여가 비용. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 41(3), 19-29.
5. 김태환, 황선환(2018). 진지한 여가 비용의 개념화. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 42(3), 83-96.
6. 김태환, 황선환(2020). 진지한 여가 비용 척도 개발 및 타당성 검증. 한국체육학회지, 59(6), 403-419.
7. 김홍설, 이문진, 황선환(2015). 직장여성의 결혼에 따른 여가제약과 여가제약협상. 한국콘텐츠학회, 15(1), 242-251.
8. 김홍설, 김태환, 황선환(2018). 진지한 여가 수준에 따른 진지한 여가 비용의 하위요인 차이 분석. 한국사회체육학회지, 74, 281-290.
9. 문지선(2017). 부부의 성역할 태도로 본 기혼여성의 경제활동. 한국사회학, 51(2), 191-232.
10. 박형준(2014). 동계스포츠 참여자의 몰입경험이 여가정체성 및 여가지속에 미치는 영향. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 38(2), 63-73.
11. 신규리, 오세숙(2009). 여가스포츠 참여자의 인구사회학적 특성에 따른 여가제약 유형화 연구. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 33(4), 157-169.
12. 신혜숙(2015). 초등학생의 학업성취도, 공동체의식, 학교행복에 관한잠재프로파일 분류 및 영향 요인 탐색. 교육평가연구, 28, 53-76.
13. 윤영선(2010). 패러글라이딩 참여자의 여가몰입이 여가정체성 및 생활만족에 미치는 영향. 한국여가레크리에이션학회지, 34(2), 195-204.
14. 정용각(2008). 레저스포츠 참가자의 기본적 심리욕구만족, 참여동기 및 지속의도와의 관계. 한국사회체육학회지, 34(2), 1591-1604.
15. 조금신, 이제홍(2019). 배드민턴 동호인의 참여정도에 따른 경기력과 운동몰입 및 자기효능감의 관계. 한국스포츠학회지, 17(2), 487-497.
16. 조형선(2022). 라켓스포츠 참여자의레크리에이션 전문화에 따른 진지한 여가편익과 비용. 박사학위논문, 서울시립대학교 대학원.
17. 통계청(2020). 2019년 생활시간조사 결과.
18. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716-723.
19. Asparouhov, T., & Muthen, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(3), 329-341.
20. Baldwin, C. K., & Norris, P. A. (1999). Exploring the dimensions of serious leisure: "love me--love my dog!". Journal of Leisure Research, 31(1), 1-17.
21. Bartram, S. A. (2001). Serious leisure careers among whitewater kayakers: A feminist perspective. World Leisure Journal, 43(2), 4-11.
22. Clark, S. L. 2010. Mixture modeling with behavioral data. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
23. King, F. L. (2001). Social dynamics of quilting. World Leisure Journal, 43(2), 26-29.
24. Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767-778.
25. Major, W. F. (2001). The benefits and costs of serious running. World Leisure Journal, 43(2), 12-25.
26. McLachlan, G. J., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite Mixture Models. New York: Wiley.
27. Nagin, D. S. (2005). Group-based Modeling of Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Rachel, K. (2010). “"We are not strippers”": How Belly Dancers Manage a (Soft) Stigmatized Serious leisure Activity. Symbolic Interaction, 33(3), 435-455.
29. Schmiege, S. J., Meek, P., Bryan, A. D., & Petersen, H. (2012). Latent variable mixture modeling: A flexible statistical approach for identifying and classifying heterogeneity. Nursing Research, 61(3), 204-212.
30. Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating dimensions of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.
31. Sclove, L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333-343.
32. Son, J. S., Kerstetter, D. L.,　& Mowen, A. J. (2008). Do age and gender matter in the constraints negotiation of physically active leisure? Journal of Leisure Research, 40(2). 267-289.
33. Stebbins, R. A. (1982). Serious leisure: A conceptual statement. Pacific sociological review, 25(2), 251-272.
34. Stebbins, R. A. (1992). Amateur, professionals, and serious leisure. Montreal, Quebec: McGill Queen's University Press.
35. Stebbins, R. A. (2001). New Directions in the Theory and Research of Serious Leisure, Mellen Studies in Sociiology, vol.28. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.
36. Stebbins, R. A. (2016). Costs, constraints, and perseverance: A rejoinder to Lamont, Kennelly, and Moyle. Journal of Leisure Research, 48(1), 1-4.
 
(06978) 서울특별시 동작구 상도로 369 숭실대학교 조만식기념관 622호
(TEL) 02-820-0085 (FAX) 08-820-0084 (E-MAIL) kslrp1982@gmail.com
사무간사 나규민) 010-2566-1038 / (TEL) 02-820-0085 / (FAX) 08-820-0084
Copyrightⓒ 2004 KOREAN SOCIETY OF LEISURE, RECREATION & PARK ALL RIGHTS RESERVED